Plastic is one of the non-degradation materials that cause pollution of earth. Some individuals believe that utilizing plastic bags for shopping should be restricted by policy. I completely agree with the given statement on the basis of have been non-degradable and harmful to human and animals.
To begin with, the main reason is that being non-degradable is a determining factor when utilizing of plastic is reduced. To put it another way, regardless of cheap price of plastic bag, they are environmentally-damaging and it takes hundreds of years to degrade in soil as if they are non-degradable. Therefore, providing that firm policy is not regulated by government authorities, after several years everywhere are more likely to fill with plastic. A good illustration for this is Take a river full of plastic bags as an example; this would lead to lost breathtaking view of the river as we expected. Thus, the less using of plastics for shopping, the better habitat for living and spectacular place for visiting.
Having said that, however, clean environment are not the only factor in this respect, another reason against restricting use plastic is that animals suffer more than human from plastic. Distributing of plastics in habitat is not only cause to have a dirty habitat as well, but they are harmful to animals. A good illustration for this is reported in magazines that many of the animals die annually because of munch on plastic bags. Hence, to better participate in taking care of animals, it is necessary to band plastic bags for shopping.
To conclude, I personally take the view that it is ethically unacceptable to pollute habitat by using plastics, which can be replaced by bio-degradable materials such as paper-base bags. It is mainly because plastic is non-degradable, lead to have dirty habitat and can destroy a huge amount of animals.
Plastic
is one of the non-degradation materials that cause pollution of earth.
Some
individuals believe that utilizing
plastic
bags
for shopping should
be restricted
by policy. I completely
agree
with the
given
statement on the basis of have been non-degradable and harmful to human and animals.
To
begin
with, the main reason is that being non-degradable is a determining factor when utilizing of
plastic
is
reduced
. To put it another way, regardless of
cheap
price of
plastic
bag
, they are
environmentally
-damaging and it takes hundreds of years to degrade in soil as if they are non-degradable.
Therefore
, providing that firm policy is not regulated by
government
authorities, after several years everywhere are more likely to fill with
plastic
. A
good
illustration for this is Take a river full of
plastic
bags
as an example; this would lead to lost breathtaking view of the river as we
expected
.
Thus
, the less using of
plastics
for shopping, the better
habitat
for living and spectacular place for visiting.
Having said that,
however
, clean environment are not the
only
factor in this respect, another reason against restricting
use
plastic
is that
animals
suffer more than human from
plastic
. Distributing of
plastics
in
habitat
is not
only
cause to have a dirty
habitat
as well
,
but
they are harmful to
animals
. A
good
illustration for this
is reported
in magazines that
many
of the
animals
die
annually
because
of munch on
plastic
bags
.
Hence
, to better participate in taking care of
animals
, it is necessary to band
plastic
bags
for shopping.
To conclude
, I
personally
take the view that it is
ethically
unacceptable to pollute
habitat
by using
plastics
, which can
be replaced
by bio-degradable materials such as paper-base
bags
. It is
mainly
because
plastic
is non-degradable, lead to have dirty
habitat
and can
destroy
a huge amount of
animals
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes