It is widely believed that one solution to environmental problems would be for governments to hike up the price of petrol. While I consider that this might be an effective measure, I would argue that other measures might have an even greater impact.
On the one hand, raising the cost of fuel for cars and other modes is one of the efficient way because of some reasons. Firstly, higher fuel prices can help to limit the number of car journeys. A large number of low and middle income earners are not able to afford the incease in the cost of petrol, therefore they are forced to adapt to other means of transport such as: bicycle, walking, train, bus, etc. Traveling by public transportation instead private cars is the necessary way to cut down on car emission and reduce greenhouse effect. Secondly, the extra money, which collected from increasing fuel prices can be used in order to compensate for the extra expense. Government can raise expenditure on upgrading and expand public facilities and transportation to suffice residents.
On the other hand, while this rise in petrol costs might be a useful stopgap measure, national authorities could apply some other solutions to tackle this problem. The first measure is to invest money in developing eco-friendly means of transport. People should be encouraged to use electric cars and motorbikes to prevent air pollution. Moreover, introducing free bus and train passes, as the increased use of public transport would help in the effort to combat global warming. Another measure is to raise people awareness of the need to cut down on emissions from their cars. Environmental campaigns shoud be carried out more, especially on social media to popularize residents efficient ways to protect the environment.
In conclusion, a sharp rise in petrol prices would be a useful environmental friendly transport measure, although in the longer term other steps would be more effective.
It is
widely
believed that one solution to environmental problems would be for
governments
to hike up the
price
of
petrol
. While I consider that this might be an effective
measure
, I would argue that
other
measures
might have an even greater impact.
On the one hand, raising the cost of fuel for
cars
and
other
modes is one of the efficient way
because
of
some
reasons.
Firstly
, higher fuel
prices
can
help
to limit the number of
car
journeys.
A large number of
low and middle income earners are not able to afford the
incease
in the cost of
petrol
,
therefore
they
are forced
to adapt to
other
means of
transport
such as: bicycle, walking, train, bus, etc. Traveling by public transportation
instead
private
cars
is the necessary way to
cut
down on
car
emission and
reduce
greenhouse effect.
Secondly
, the extra money, which collected from increasing fuel
prices
can be
used
in order to compensate for the extra expense.
Government
can raise expenditure on upgrading and expand public facilities and transportation to suffice residents.
On the
other
hand, while this rise in
petrol
costs might be a useful stopgap
measure
, national authorities could apply
some
other
solutions to tackle this problem. The
first
measure
is to invest money in developing eco-friendly means of
transport
.
People
should
be encouraged
to
use
electric
cars
and motorbikes to
prevent
air pollution.
Moreover
, introducing free bus and train passes, as the increased
use
of public
transport
would
help
in the effort to combat global warming. Another
measure
is to raise
people
awareness of the need to
cut
down on emissions from their
cars
. Environmental campaigns
shoud
be carried
out more,
especially
on social media to popularize residents efficient ways to protect the environment.
In conclusion
, a sharp rise in
petrol
prices
would be a useful environmental friendly
transport
measure
, although in the longer term
other
steps would be more effective.