Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? v.1

Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. v. 1
It is commonly believed by many that inflating the cost of fuel is the most efficient way to solve environmental issues. I partially agree with them because I believe that although it is an important way but there are many other more effective ways of doing so. On one hand, increase in the rate of fuel would definitely reduce the level of pollution to some extent. As increased rate will discourage people to use their vehicles unnecessarily, as it is a common trend to drive a car even though the distance is walkable. This will encourage people to use pooling of vehicle while going to same site. For instance, if five people from one community work in same office or location, it is the efficient to go by one car alternatively. This will also motivate them to use bicycles and public transport system. Thus, this will solve the problem to some extent. On the other hand, I believe this is not the key method and there are many other effective ways to solve environmental issues such as growing more trees and avoid use of plastic bags. Plastic containers should be replaced by bio-degradable glass dishes. Also I believe that this change would provide some level of discomfort to the public as the public transport system in most of the countries are not very convenient. In short, only increasing the rate of fuel would not protect the environment, people have to become conscious about the surrounding and put their contribution by many other ways such as aforementioned. In conclusion, I agree that inflated rates of fuel would decrease the environmental problems but it is not the most efficient way, as it will benefit the environment but may provide inconvenience to public. Only increasing the rate of fuel would not improve the adverse condition of our environment, many other measures need to be taken such as planting trees, choosing glass over plastic and using renewable resources instead of fossil fuels.
It is
commonly
believed by
many
that inflating the cost of
fuel
is the most efficient
way
to solve environmental issues. I
partially
agree
with them
because
I believe that although it is an
important
way
but
there are
many
other
more effective
ways
of doing
so
.

On one hand, increase in the
rate
of
fuel
would definitely
reduce
the level of pollution to
some
extent. As increased
rate
will discourage
people
to
use
their vehicles
unnecessarily
, as it is a common trend to drive a car
even though
the distance is walkable. This will encourage
people
to
use
pooling of vehicle while going to same site.
For instance
, if five
people
from one community work in same office or location, it is the efficient to go by one car
alternatively
. This will
also
motivate them to
use
bicycles and
public
transport system.
Thus
, this will solve the problem to
some
extent.

On the
other
hand, I believe this is not the key method and there are
many
other
effective
ways
to solve environmental issues such as growing more trees and avoid
use
of plastic bags. Plastic containers should
be replaced
by bio-degradable glass dishes.
Also
I believe that this
change
would provide
some
level of discomfort to the
public
as the
public
transport system in most of the countries are not
very
convenient. In short,
only
increasing the
rate
of
fuel
would not protect the environment,
people
have to
become conscious about the surrounding and put their contribution by
many
other
ways
such as aforementioned.

In conclusion
, I
agree
that inflated
rates
of
fuel
would decrease the environmental problems
but
it is not the most efficient
way
, as it will benefit the environment
but
may provide inconvenience to
public
.
Only
increasing the
rate
of
fuel
would not
improve
the adverse condition of our environment,
many
other
measures need to
be taken
such as planting trees, choosing glass over plastic and using renewable resources
instead
of fossil
fuels
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
30Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne

IELTS essay Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
328 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts