Globalization has resulted in the advancement of people-connecting technology and travelling. Is it possible for a personnel to perform from his base venue for any other place of job? Of course, yes. Human resource now has a wider choice to stay, and task anywhere in the globe because of this development of technology and transport. While this high-tech growth has few disadvantages, in my opinion, the advantages certainly outweigh them. In this essay we will weigh both the pros and cons of this debate, and will draw an inference.
Along with freedom to operate and choice of stay, comes few challenges. When a person works from distant, it lacks effective interaction with peers, subordinates and other co-workers, which sometimes result in an expectation mismatch, hence, not providing the realistic outcome. Now, to address this issue, people travel and get the required job done. However, such frequent travels have resulted in massive pollution (because of increased air, land and water traffic), and therefore, affecting the environment. As a result, the flexibility of working comes at a worth of personnel mis-interaction and a dire consequence of our nature.
On the flip side, this advancement saves time and money of both worker and employer. If, people are made to relocate to various locations because of endeavour, that implies a huge investment. . Whereas, occasional travelling can solve this purpose in much lesser rate. A recent study by Mckisney has stated that people who have flexibility of work area performs 35% better than those who do not get this opportunity. Relocations outlay high to both worker and an organization, which can instead be invested in a better way.
To recapitulate, having mulled over above stated information, and deliberating all the facts, it can be deducted that, with technical progress in communications and the carriage a staff can perform irrespective of the company whereabouts. I opine that even though it hinders in pernicious communication and requires various travels, still, its benefits outweighs it shortfalls by saving hugely on timings and money for the organization.
Globalization has resulted in the advancement of
people
-connecting technology and travelling. Is it possible for a personnel to perform from his base venue for any other place of job?
Of course
, yes. Human resource
now
has a wider choice to stay, and task anywhere in the globe
because of this
development of technology and transport. While this high-tech growth has few disadvantages, in my opinion, the advantages
certainly
outweigh them. In this essay we will weigh both the pros and cons of this debate, and will draw an inference.
Along with freedom to operate and choice of stay,
comes
few challenges. When a person works from distant, it lacks effective interaction with peers, subordinates and other co-workers, which
sometimes
result in an expectation mismatch,
hence
, not providing the realistic outcome.
Now
, to address this issue,
people
travel and
get
the required job done.
However
, such frequent travels have resulted in massive pollution (
because
of increased air, land and water traffic), and
therefore
, affecting the environment.
As a result
, the flexibility of working
comes
at a worth of personnel
mis-interaction
and a dire consequence of our nature.
On the flip side, this advancement saves time and money of both worker and employer. If,
people
are made
to relocate to various locations
because
of
endeavour
, that implies a huge investment.
.
Whereas
, occasional travelling can solve this purpose in much lesser rate. A recent study by
Mckisney
has stated that
people
who have flexibility of work area performs 35% better than those who do not
get
this opportunity. Relocations outlay high to both worker and an organization, which can
instead
be invested
in a better way.
To recapitulate, having mulled over above stated information, and deliberating all the facts, it can
be deducted
that, with technical progress in communications and the carriage a staff can perform irrespective of the
company
whereabouts. I opine that
even though
it hinders in pernicious communication and requires various travels,
still
, its benefits outweighs it shortfalls by saving
hugely
on timings and money for the organization.