There are those who believe that only students with excellent grades must be approved by universities while others think they must offer an opportunity to pupils of all ages equally without considering their marks. In this essay, I am going to examine the question from both points of view and then give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue the benefits of accepting only students with high grade outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that universities have their duty to manage qualified and exemplary students, and to develop their talents for the better future of countries and communities. It is also possible to say that pupils with satisfactory grades mean not only they have high intelligence but also a strong willingness to achieve. A good illustration of this is most students who have high marks are likely to respect professors very much and study exceptionally hard.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that the environment influences people’s behaviour and development. People often have this opinion because sometimes students with a great potential could not focus on study because they had to spend their time to make a living and then try entering universities for academic success in their late age. A second point is that the conventional system is not perfect to evaluate talented students. A particularly good example here is that a student with a great scientific mind, who is not a native English speaker, might not be accepted because of the reason that he is not good at English.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that universities should allow all students to enrol their schools without considering their grades because not every student is fully supported by their families, and conventional platforms to assess students are hard to say ‘perfect’.
There are those
who
believe that
only
students
with excellent
grades
must
be approved
by
universities
while others
think
they
must
offer an opportunity to pupils of all ages
equally
without considering their marks. In this essay, I am going to examine the question from both points of view and then give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument, there are
people
who
argue the benefits of accepting
only
students
with high
grade
outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that
universities
have their duty to manage qualified and exemplary
students
, and to develop their talents for the better future of countries and communities. It is
also
possible to say that pupils with satisfactory
grades
mean not
only
they have high intelligence
but
also
a strong willingness to achieve. A
good
illustration of this is most
students
who
have high marks are likely to respect professors
very
much and study
exceptionally
hard
.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
make
the opposing case. It is
often
argued that the environment influences
people
’s
behaviour
and development.
People
often
have this opinion
because
sometimes
students
with a great potential could not focus on study
because
they had to spend their time to
make
a living and then try entering
universities
for academic success in their late age. A second point is that the conventional system is not perfect to evaluate talented
students
. A
particularly
good
example here is that a
student
with a great scientific mind,
who
is not a native English speaker, might not be
accepted
because
of the reason that he is not
good
at English.
In conclusion
, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that
universities
should
allow
all
students
to enrol their schools without considering their
grades
because
not every
student
is
fully
supported by their families, and conventional platforms to assess
students
are
hard
to say ‘perfect’.