There are different views about whether governments should only focus on the teaching of science subjects to help their countries develop. While I accept that concentrating on these subjects brings about benefits, I would argue that it is better not to neglect other subjects.
For a variety of reasons, I agree that the focus on teaching science-related subjects helps a country progress. Firstly, many of the scientific breakthroughs rely heavily on in-depth knowledge of mathematics, physics and chemistry. For example, in the field of medicine, scientists need a great knowledge of chemistry to do research and invent new drugs. The teaching quality of these subjects should therefore be continuously improved. Secondly, when students study science subjects, they need to find solutions to a wide range of different problems, which can encourage their creativity and imagination. Such capabilities play an
Important role in coming up with technological innovations, [and these advances help a country gain a competitive edge over other nations.
Despite the above arguments, it seems to me that students should also pay attention to other subjects. In the era of globalisation, international trade significantly contributes to the development of a country. It is nearly impossible to engage in trading activities with other countries if language barriers exist. This means that the government needs to invest in the teaching of foreign languages, in Singapore, for instance, most people can speak English fluently because the school curriculum focuses largely on this subject. Since Singaporean people are able to work with people from abroad, the country attracts many investments from other parts of the world.
In conclusion, while I agree that government spending on teaching science subjects helps a country progress, I believe that teaching subjects such as foreign languages is also necessary.
There are
different
views about whether
governments
should
only
focus on the
teaching
of science
subjects
to
help
their
countries
develop. While I accept that concentrating on these
subjects
brings about benefits, I would argue that it is better not to neglect
other
subjects.
For a variety of reasons, I
agree
that the focus on
teaching
science-related
subjects
helps
a
country
progress.
Firstly
,
many
of the scientific breakthroughs rely
heavily
on in-depth knowledge of mathematics, physics and chemistry.
For example
, in the field of medicine, scientists need a great knowledge of chemistry to do research and invent new drugs. The
teaching
quality of these
subjects
should
therefore
be
continuously
improved
.
Secondly
, when students study science
subjects
, they need to find solutions to a wide range of
different
problems, which can encourage their creativity and imagination. Such capabilities play
an
Important
role in coming up with technological innovations,
[
and these advances
help
a
country
gain a competitive edge over
other
nations.
Despite the above arguments, it seems to me that students should
also
pay attention to
other
subjects
. In the era of
globalisation
, international trade
significantly
contributes to the development of a
country
. It is
nearly
impossible to engage in trading activities with
other
countries
if language barriers exist. This means that the
government
needs to invest in the
teaching
of foreign languages, in Singapore,
for instance
, most
people
can speak English
fluently
because
the school curriculum focuses
largely
on this
subject
. Since Singaporean
people
are able to work with
people
from abroad, the
country
attracts
many
investments from
other
parts of the world.
In conclusion
, while I
agree
that
government
spending on
teaching
science
subjects
helps
a
country
progress, I believe that
teaching
subjects
such as foreign languages is
also
necessary.