It is true that the prevalence of tourism in remote areas has been expanded over that past few years. While I accept that it may exert detrimental impacts, I believe that this trend also bring about several advantages.
On the one hand, there are two major minuses when tourists wander off the beaten tracks. Regarding to local people, cultural clashes, happening when visitors lack respects for tradition and regulations, stand out as the most discernible inconvenience. Indeed, if foreigners behave inappropriately and violate destinations’ codes of conduct, this will not only deprive domestic residents of social orders and tranquility, but also cause a loss of moral and religious values. Regarding to the environment, such types of travel as ecotourism or wildlife safaris make attraction thronged with tourists, and this is believed to create an excessive pressure on limited resources and infrastructures. Consequently, scenery depletion and ecological crisis are predicted to occupy remote areas due to mass tourism.
On the other hand, travel to isolated regions is also recognized to be advantageous because of several benefits. Firstly, the more visitors experience local natural and cultural heritage, the more likely their images and identity of locals are to go viral. Therefore, this may help citizens raise public awareness of their importance, as well as stimulate interests and involvement in conservation, which has puzzled authorities for years. Secondly, another gain stems from economic values. In particular, in order to keep pace with travelers’ demand and receive a massive influx of money, local service sector is thought to need a huge number of labors. Not only does this create jobs but also help residents improve employment and earning prospects thanks to tourism-related professional training.
In brief, it seems to me that traveling to remote areas has a double-edged impact on both residents and the society.
It is true that the prevalence of tourism in remote areas has
been expanded
over that past few years. While I accept that it may exert detrimental impacts, I believe that this trend
also
bring about several advantages.
On the one hand, there are two major minuses when tourists wander off the beaten
tracks
.
Regarding to
local
people
, cultural clashes, happening when visitors lack respects for tradition and regulations, stand out as the most discernible inconvenience.
Indeed
, if foreigners behave
inappropriately
and violate destinations’ codes of conduct, this will not
only
deprive domestic residents of social orders and tranquility,
but
also
cause a loss of moral and religious values.
Regarding to
the environment, such types of travel as ecotourism or wildlife safaris
make
attraction thronged with tourists, and this
is believed
to create an excessive pressure on limited resources and infrastructures.
Consequently
, scenery depletion and ecological crisis
are predicted
to occupy remote areas due to mass tourism.
On the other hand
, travel to isolated regions is
also
recognized to be advantageous
because
of several benefits.
Firstly
, the more visitors experience
local
natural and cultural heritage, the more likely their images and identity of
locals
are to go viral.
Therefore
, this may
help
citizens raise public awareness of their importance,
as well
as stimulate interests and involvement in conservation, which has puzzled authorities for years.
Secondly
, another gain stems from economic values.
In particular
, in order to
keep
pace with travelers’ demand and receive a massive influx of money,
local
service sector is
thought
to need a huge number of labors. Not
only
does this create jobs
but
also
help
residents
improve
employment and earning prospects thanks to tourism-related professional training.
In brief
, it seems to me that traveling to remote areas has a double-edged impact on both residents and the society.