While a vast majority of people believe that there is no need for any extraordinary ability to perform artistic job, such as painting and music, others claim that only the individuals with an inborn talent are suitable for this task. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth, concluding with my perspective.
To commence with, the advocates of the statement argue that the creation of art can be done through every human being no matter what their background status hold. Because they might opine that there are the skills which anyone can learn with some sort of dedication and hard trial. To support my statement, a famous singer, Neha Kakkar is not from a musical background rather she has struggled to achieve this name and fame. Similarly, Salman Khan was not a painter by birth instead he has enhanced his ability and make it, his favourite leisure time activity. Therefore, it would not be wrong to say that perfection over various forms of art can be acquired by practicing.
On the other hand, there are others who favour that innate abilities are most significant to become a successful artist. For them, producing an art can be sheer possible when a person holds some specific talents in that particular field and consequently they are able to shape skill without deferring in doing that. For example, the queen of singing world, Lata Mangeshkar was born with amelodious sound, and it helped her a lot in attaining the popularity among the audience.
To elucidate, although it is true that individuals with inherent traits do excel in the art world, it cannot be denied that hard work of a person wins at the end. . I opine that the only need to achieve victory over certain form of art is the strong determination.
While a vast majority of
people
believe that there is no need for any extraordinary ability to perform artistic job, such as painting and music, others claim that
only
the individuals with an inborn talent are suitable for this task. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth, concluding with my perspective.
To commence with, the advocates of the statement argue that the creation of
art
can
be done
through every human being no matter what their background status hold.
Because
they might opine that there are the
skills
which anyone can learn with
some
sort of dedication and
hard
trial. To support my statement, a
famous
singer,
Neha
Kakkar
is not from a musical background
rather
she has struggled to achieve this name and fame.
Similarly
, Salman Khan was not a painter by birth
instead
he has enhanced his ability and
make
it, his
favourite
leisure time activity.
Therefore
, it would not be
wrong
to say that perfection over various forms of
art
can
be acquired
by practicing.
On the other hand
, there are others who
favour
that innate abilities are most significant to become a successful artist. For them, producing an
art
can be sheer possible when a person holds
some
specific talents in that particular field and
consequently
they are able to shape
skill
without deferring in doing that.
For example
, the queen of singing world,
Lata
Mangeshkar
was born
with
amelodious
sound, and it
helped
her a lot in attaining the popularity among the audience.
To elucidate, although it is true that individuals with inherent traits do excel in the
art
world, it cannot
be denied
that
hard
work of a person wins at the
end
.
.
I opine that the
only
need to achieve victory over certain form of
art
is the strong determination.