Owing to the fact which online messages and conversations are usually quite condensed and simple, some people think it would lead to the disappearance of grammar and spelling. In my point of view, I do not concur with this statement and this essay will further illustrate my opinion.
Firstly, basic foundations of a language such as grammar and spelling cannot be extinguished by the increase of online communication because people still apply the same grammar and words to interact on the internet. Despite the fact that sentences tend to be shorter and words are more likely to have some alternations in text messages, the same standard structures of a language are used when people chat. For instance, "asap" resembles for "as soon as possible", it's used widely across every English speaking nations. Placed in a right location in sentences, the idiom still obeys every grammatical rules. For those reasons, online communication are not likely to bring an end to conventional grammar and spelling.
Secondly, traditional grammar and spelling would still be dominantly applied in formal written papers, official documents and education. In particular, mails, letters and lectures are still being composed in the way that abbreviations are not accepted. In addition, formal and legal documents are required to be typed in correct grammars and words. If, one day, governments decided that they would use abbreviated words in contracts between countries, grammar and spelling might gradually be removed. However, the scenario are not likely to happen. Thus, grammatical and spelling rules will always be securely kept in various forms of communication.
In conclusion, this essay illustrated my opposition with the mentioned point of view. Although text messages and online communicating methods may lead to the deduction in formal grammar and word-spelling among the users, they won’t bring an end to traditional language standards.
Owing to the fact which
online
messages and conversations are
usually
quite condensed and simple,
some
people
think
it would lead to the disappearance of
grammar
and spelling. In my point of view, I do not concur with this statement and this essay will
further
illustrate my opinion.
Firstly
, basic foundations of a language such as
grammar
and spelling cannot
be extinguished
by the increase of
online
communication
because
people
still
apply the same
grammar
and words to interact on the internet. Despite the fact that sentences tend to be shorter and words are more likely to have
some
alternations in text messages, the same standard structures of a language are
used
when
people
chat.
For instance
,
"
asap
"
resembles for
"
as
soon
as possible
"
, it's
used
widely
across every
English speaking
nations. Placed in a right location in sentences, the idiom
still
obeys every grammatical
rules
. For those reasons,
online
communication are not likely to bring an
end
to conventional
grammar
and spelling.
Secondly
, traditional
grammar
and spelling would
still
be
dominantly
applied in formal written papers, official documents and education.
In particular
, mails, letters and lectures are
still
being composed
in the way that abbreviations are not
accepted
.
In addition
, formal and legal documents
are required
to
be typed
in correct
grammars
and words. If, one day,
governments
decided that they would
use
abbreviated words in contracts between countries,
grammar
and spelling might
gradually
be removed
.
However
, the scenario are not likely to happen.
Thus
, grammatical and spelling
rules
will always be
securely
kept
in various forms of communication.
In conclusion
, this essay illustrated my opposition with the mentioned point of view. Although text messages and
online
communicating methods may lead to the deduction in formal
grammar
and word-spelling among the users, they won’t bring an
end
to traditional language standards.