Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benifits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks of using it. v.1

Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benifits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks of using it. v. 1
Nowadays, non-renewable energy sources are consumed at such a rate that it will completely exhaust in coming 30 to 40 years. It will be only found in history books or as an artefact in the museum. In my opinion, the best substitution for the non-renewable energy resources should be nuclear energy. Firstly, it can serve as a source of renewable energy which is needed as a fuel for vehicles and large machinery, power plants and thus keeping the daily life on track. Secondly, one of the major areas of concern is the reduction in pollution. In other terms reduction in release of harmful gas like sulphur, carbon monoxide. These harmful gases are released as a by-product when we burn petrol or diesel, thus increasing pollution and global warming. Third advantage is the growth and progress in technology as using of nuclear fuels will create a need for advanced vehicles. Moreover, certain limitations regarding the usage should be strictly imposed for nuclear fuel. Legal permissions, guidelines, governmental licenses should be imposed on the firms manufacturing nuclear powered vehicles. Responsible institutions and individuals should step up for saving and replacing non-renewable resources as directly or indirectly it affects the nation’s development and progress in the global world, which is full of competition. As a concerned citizen and an up growing economy, it would be better if we start supporting researchers, scientists involved in developing alternative energy forms, and thus managing our lifestyles to consume less by subjecting ourselves to the changes. I conclude that, the substitution of nuclear energy with coal and oil is a good alternative. Although there are disadvantages, it can be easily tackled by imposing certain laws and norms. The reduction in pollution and global warming is necessary, thus making a way to advance renewable energy sources. It also helps to save the non – renewable sources.
Nowadays, non-renewable
energy
sources
are consumed
at such a rate that it will completely exhaust in coming 30 to 40 years. It will be
only
found in history books or as an
artefact
in the museum. In my opinion, the best substitution for the non-renewable
energy
resources should be nuclear energy.

Firstly
, it can serve as a
source
of renewable
energy
which
is needed
as a fuel for vehicles and large machinery, power plants and
thus
keeping the daily life on
track
.
Secondly
, one of the major areas of concern is the reduction in pollution. In other terms reduction in release of harmful gas like
sulphur
, carbon monoxide. These harmful gases
are released
as a by-product when we burn petrol or diesel,
thus
increasing pollution and global warming.

Third advantage is the growth and progress in technology as using of nuclear fuels will create a need for advanced vehicles.

Moreover
, certain limitations regarding the usage should be
strictly
imposed for nuclear fuel. Legal permissions, guidelines, governmental licenses should
be imposed
on the firms manufacturing
nuclear powered
vehicles. Responsible institutions and individuals should step up for saving and replacing non-renewable resources as
directly
or
indirectly
it affects the nation’s development and progress in the global world, which is full of competition. As a concerned citizen and an up growing economy, it would be better if we
start
supporting researchers, scientists involved in developing alternative
energy
forms, and
thus
managing our lifestyles to consume less by subjecting ourselves to the
changes
.

I conclude that, the substitution of nuclear
energy
with coal and oil is a
good
alternative. Although there are disadvantages, it can be
easily
tackled by imposing certain laws and norms. The reduction in pollution and global warming is necessary,
thus
making a way to advance renewable
energy
sources
. It
also
helps
to save the
non – renewable
sources
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benifits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks of using it. v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
308 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts