Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? v.1

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? v. 1
The preference of the nuclear energy as a choice is debatable. Now-a-days, this energy is suggested to be a preferable choice for meeting the overwhelming need. This essay will discuss, why nuclear energy is the best choice for meeting the rising demands. Quite a lot of people, suggest that the nuclear energy is the best source for producing the electricity, as they are less vulnerable, when compared to others. They are likely to produce less carbon-di-oxide, in contrast to other types of sources that are used for generating the current. As, there is less production of harmful gases, there is minimal damage to the environment, by reducing the acid rain, the global warming etc. As, an illustration, in China before using this source for manufacturing the current, their pollution rate was uncontrollable, but after the usage of this, it came down by 80%. In earlier times, the China was using the fossil fuel, which released, huge amount of toxic gases, and meanwhile, they were very harmful to both the environment and the humans. However, there is a dramatic surge in the usage of the former, as their installation does not require any cause to humans. The raw material needed in nuclear energy, is Uranium and they do not consume a lot of space, whereas, the other energy providers, occupy a plenty of space. To support, the wind energy is also a preferable one in terms of pollution, but when it comes to the space, this requires a huge area and it will not allow the people nearby to stay peacefully. The noise created by this energy provider will not allow the public to live around it, and they also occupy a lot of residential area. In conclusion, it is strongly evident that the nuclear power station provides many benefits to the public, in terms of pollution, generating electricity and they also do not disturb the regular lifestyle of the surroundings.
The preference of the nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
as a choice is debatable.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Now
-a-days, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is suggested
to be a preferable choice for meeting the overwhelming need. This essay will discuss, why nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is the best choice for meeting the rising demands.

Quite
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, suggest that the nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is the best source for producing the electricity, as they are less vulnerable, when compared to others. They are likely to produce less
Possible spelling mistake found.
carbon-di-oxide
,
in contrast
to other types of sources that are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for generating the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
. As, there is less production of harmful gases, there is minimal damage to the environment, by reducing the acid rain, the global warming etc. As, an illustration, in China
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
using this source for manufacturing the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
, their pollution rate was uncontrollable,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after the usage of this, it came down by 80%. In earlier times, the China was using the fossil fuel, which released, huge amount of toxic gases, and meanwhile, they were
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
harmful to both the environment and the humans.

However
, there is a dramatic surge in the usage of the former, as their installation does not require any cause to humans. The raw material needed in nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, is
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Uranium and
they do not consume
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
space, whereas, the other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
providers, occupy a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plenty
of space. To support, the wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is
also
a preferable one in terms of pollution,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
when it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to the space, this requires a huge area and it will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
nearby to stay
peacefully
. The noise created by this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
provider will not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
the public to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
around it, and they
also
occupy
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
residential area.

In conclusion
, it is
strongly
evident that the nuclear power station provides
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
benefits to the public, in terms of pollution, generating
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
electricity and
they
also
do not disturb the regular lifestyle of the surroundings.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS essay Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
320 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts