Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? v.5

Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? v. 5
In this increasingly competitive society, high-level qualifications are considered to be more expected than life experience or personal qualities by some employers when they seek new candidates these days. In my perspective point of view, I believe that this is a negative movement. There are two factors to explain why recruiters put formal academic certifications as top priorities when recruiting new employees. Firstly, in many professions, a university degree is needed for a specific job. A student has to devote a lot of time and effort to his or her study in order to get a university qualification which somehow prove that this student is a hard-working and persevering person. For instance, a candidate for biology teacher position is required to have a great deal of knowledge at university as well as spend a lot of time to practice and carry out experiments. Secondly, this tendency might be a great way for a recruiter to save time finding top-notch applicants. Selecting the candidates base on common criteria certificates is necessary for screening the good candidates from a large applicant pool before employers find their excellent and right employee. Compared to formal academic candidates who are likely ready to start working, employers may have to spend time on training non-academic applicants how to work properly. However, I think that this is a negative development and recruiters should consider a mix of factors, including education background, work experience and personalities. Many people decide to work right after school instead of starting tertiary education in order to gain life skills and practical experience. On top of that, after a long time of working in a real work environment, people are also capable of doing most assigned tasks without a formal academic education. In addition, warmth and smiles indicate the type of employee who will work well with others. An unhappy worker takes more time to finish the quest, does only the minimum to avoid being fired while a happy worker finds value in the work they do, and do the best they can to finish it. In conclusion, compared with qualifications, life experience and personal traits are considered less important criterion for employers to assess potential employees, and I believe that this is a negative progress for the above-mentioned arguments
In this
increasingly
competitive society, high-level qualifications
are considered
to be more
expected
than life
experience
or personal qualities by
some
employers
when they seek new
candidates
these days. In my perspective point of view, I believe that this is a
negative
movement.

There are two factors to
explain
why recruiters put formal academic certifications as top priorities when recruiting new
employees
.
Firstly
, in
many
professions, a university degree
is needed
for a specific job. A student
has to
devote
a lot of
time
and effort to
his or her
study in order to
get
a university qualification which somehow prove that this student is a
hard
-working and persevering person.
For instance
, a
candidate
for biology teacher position
is required
to have a great deal of knowledge at university
as well
as spend
a lot of
time
to practice and carry out experiments.
Secondly
, this tendency might be a great way for a recruiter to save
time
finding top-notch applicants. Selecting the
candidates
base on common criteria certificates is necessary for screening the
good
candidates
from a large applicant pool
before
employers
find their excellent and right
employee
. Compared to formal academic
candidates
who are likely ready to
start
working,
employers
may
have to
spend
time
on training non-academic applicants how to
work
properly
.

However
, I
think
that this is a
negative
development and recruiters should consider a mix of factors, including education background,
work
experience
and personalities.
Many
people
decide to
work
right after school
instead
of starting tertiary education in order to gain life
skills
and practical
experience
.
On top of that
, after a long
time
of working in a real
work
environment,
people
are
also
capable of doing most assigned tasks without a formal academic education.
In addition
, warmth and smiles indicate the type of
employee
who will
work
well with others. An unhappy worker takes more
time
to finish the quest, does
only
the minimum to avoid
being fired
while a happy worker finds value in the
work
they do, and do the best they can to finish it.

In conclusion
, compared with qualifications, life
experience
and personal traits
are considered
less
important
criterion for
employers
to assess potential
employees
, and I believe that this is a
negative
progress for the above-mentioned arguments
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
29Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne

IELTS essay Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
376 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts