In the salad days of the millennium, the society is polarised into two groups almost equally. Regarding the notion, whether government should supervise over the news, which break the rules and publish information about individuals, private life or newspaper should get freedom to publish anything they want. However, different people have their distinct mindset. In my opinion, The authority has to control these publishers because it is against the freedom to live.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to share in its favour. The newspapers are crossing the limits in order to increase the sales. Although there are many issues, which are severe, in society, they publish about personal life. In order to control these media, authority must take an action on illegal printers. If bureaucrats take a reaction on this, the media will stop to print articles. To illustrate, In 2010, Ettifaq, which is the famous newspaper in Bangladesh printed an article about Siam Ahmed, who is the famous star, marriage. At that time the government took a reaction against the publisher. Hence the newspapers didn't try to publish such things.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, the government has no need to react to these things because celebrities have a lot of responsibilities of society so that they should be in a polite manner. News articles are being published, but Celebies need to maintain calm. When stars stay in a polite manner, media also will write in a same kind. For an example, Sakil Khan, who is a famous actor, had cheated many girls with using his stardom. At that time, the media focused in a good way. Hence he was arrested. Every one has to do their work ten societies will success.
To conclude, I believe that If authority take an action on newspapers which are printing celebrities personal matters severely, the media don't publish these things.
In the salad days of the millennium, the
society
is
polarised
into two groups almost
equally
. Regarding the notion, whether
government
should supervise over the news, which break the
rules
and
publish
information about individuals, private life or
newspaper
should
get
freedom to
publish
anything they want.
However
,
different
people
have their distinct mindset. In my opinion, The authority
has to
control these publishers
because
it is against the freedom to
live
.
To commence with the
first
notion, there are myriad things to share in its
favour
. The
newspapers
are crossing the limits in order to increase the sales. Although there are
many
issues, which are severe, in
society
, they
publish
about personal life. In order to control these
media
, authority
must
take an action on illegal printers. If bureaucrats take a reaction on this, the
media
will
stop
to print articles. To illustrate, In 2010,
Ettifaq
, which is the
famous
newspaper
in Bangladesh printed an article about Siam Ahmed, who is the
famous
star, marriage. At that time the
government
took a reaction against the publisher.
Hence
the
newspapers
didn't try to
publish
such things.
Shifting towards the second school of
thought
, the
government
has no need to react to these things
because
celebrities have
a lot of
responsibilities of
society
so
that they should be
in a polite manner
. News articles are
being published
,
but
Celebies
need to maintain calm. When stars stay
in a polite manner
,
media
also
will write in a same kind. For an example,
Sakil
Khan, who is a
famous
actor, had cheated
many
girls with using his stardom. At that time, the
media
focused in a
good
way.
Hence
he
was arrested
. Every one
has to
do their work ten
societies
will success.
To conclude
, I believe that If authority take an action on
newspapers
which are printing celebrities personal matters
severely
, the
media
don't
publish
these things.