Today, an enormous amount of money has been invested on international news by the news channel companies. People often feel that the local news should be given more importance as they were more appropriate to their lives and it required funding. However, I completely disagree with the statement and this essay will discuss the various reasons to support the my view.
Firstly, with the help of global news only and by funding for them, a large number of people have an ability to watch those news. By which it leads to an abundant increase in their viewership of that specific news channel. The TRP rating of the global news companies always greater than the news companies which cover the local adverts and information. For instance, The Times of India, is a leading news channel which invested about 50 million bucks, which it has over 80% TRP rating when compared with other local news companies. Additionally, people often required national and global news. It's because the majority of people already aware about the regional and community level information but they do not have any information on the international news.
In addition to that, by allocating more funds on the companies, they will gain a major public sector shares and stocks. Since the news channel is an international branded company, people will invest to buy that news channel shares and equities. Moreover, people often prefer to subscribe the national news rather than the local news channel. It's mainly because of the trusted information they publish and deliver to their viewers. A spokesperson from an international news, company told that over 90 percentage of people believe the news bulletins of national news channel only.
To conclude, in my view, by considering a enormous popularity and stocks and shares of the news channel, Its wise decision to invest more funds on the international news rather than the local news
Today
, an enormous amount of money has
been invested
on
international
news
by the
news
channel
companies
.
People
often
feel that the
local
news
should be
given
more importance as they were more appropriate to their
lives
and it required funding.
However
, I completely disagree with the statement and this essay will discuss the various reasons to support
the my view
.
Firstly
, with the
help
of global
news
only
and by funding for them,
a large number of
people
have an ability to
watch
those
news
. By which it leads to an abundant increase in their viewership of that specific
news
channel
. The TRP rating of the global
news
companies
always greater than the
news
companies
which cover the
local
adverts and
information
.
For instance
, The Times of India, is a leading
news
channel
which invested about 50 million bucks, which it has over 80% TRP rating when compared with other
local
news
companies
.
Additionally
,
people
often
required national and global
news
. It's
because
the majority of
people
already aware about the regional and community level
information
but
they do not have any
information
on the
international
news.
In addition
to that, by allocating more funds on the
companies
, they will gain a major public sector shares and stocks. Since the
news
channel
is an
international branded
company
,
people
will invest to
buy
that
news
channel
shares and equities.
Moreover
,
people
often
prefer to subscribe the national
news
rather
than the
local
news
channel
. It's
mainly
because
of the trusted
information
they publish and deliver to their viewers. A spokesperson from an
international
news
,
company
told
that over 90 percentage of
people
believe the
news
bulletins of national
news
channel
only
.
To conclude
, in my view, by considering
a
enormous popularity and stocks and shares of the
news
channel
, Its wise decision to invest more funds on the
international
news
rather
than the
local
news
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
57Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes