Many people hold a view that adolescents over eighteen years old are obligated to leave their family and earn a living for themselves. Although I understand that those citizens have adequate rights to make their own decisions, this essay takes issue with the view mentioned because of the reasons below.
On the one hand, people in favour of individualism argue that the teenagers acquire eligibility to pursue their passion and take responsibility for their choices. If the young live with their family too long, they might become the burdens whilst they could dedicate to themselves and society when they live and subsist independently. On the other hand, I suppose that when living apart, the teenagers might be lured to indulge in social evils such as addiction and violence, in addition, these youngsters are subjected to the laws and punishments for those have no privilege which they used to obtain when they were a child. To illustrate this case, courts could pass a capital sentence to adult murders while defendants under 18 just receive a prison one. Accordingly, the adolescents should stay with the family to be taught and protected until they acquire fully aware of life along with having sufficiently soft skills.
Besides, I realize that it is of great importance for the young to be supported by the parents to receive higher education when they graduate from their high school rather than making their own living too early. In comparison with graduates, people without academic certificates are usually predominated in the competitive society. Moreover, the family is the warmest place in the world in which people always find solace. Therefore the youngsters will suffer from depression if they are forced to live apart from their home.
Subsequently weighing all the aforementioned, I firmly believe that it is more plausible for the youngster continue to live with their family after they come to the age of eighteen
Many
people
hold a view that adolescents over eighteen years
old
are obligated
to
leave
their
family
and earn a living for themselves. Although I understand that those citizens have adequate rights to
make
their
own
decisions, this essay takes issue with the view mentioned
because
of the reasons below.
On the one hand,
people
in
favour
of individualism argue that the
teenagers
acquire eligibility to pursue their passion and take responsibility for their choices. If the young
live
with their
family
too long, they might become the burdens whilst they could dedicate to themselves and society when they
live
and subsist
independently
.
On the other hand
, I suppose that when living apart, the
teenagers
might
be lured
to indulge in social evils such as addiction and violence,
in addition
, these youngsters
are subjected
to the laws and punishments for those have no privilege which they
used
to obtain when they were a child. To illustrate this case, courts could pass a capital sentence to adult murders while defendants under 18
just
receive a prison one.
Accordingly
, the adolescents should stay with the
family
to
be taught
and protected until they acquire
fully
aware of life along with having
sufficiently
soft
skills
.
Besides
, I realize that it is of great importance for the young to
be supported
by the parents to receive higher education when they graduate from their high school
rather
than making their
own
living too early.
In comparison
with graduates,
people
without academic certificates are
usually
predominated in the competitive society.
Moreover
, the
family
is the warmest place in the world in which
people
always find solace.
Therefore
the youngsters will suffer from depression if they
are forced
to
live
apart from their home.
Subsequently
weighing all the aforementioned, I
firmly
believe that it is more plausible for the youngster continue to
live
with their
family
after they
come
to the age of eighteen