Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. v.6

Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 6
Governments and citizens across the world are facing an ethical dilemma over the use of animals in laboratory testing for drugs and other products. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal-based experiments for the well-being of humanity. On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experiments. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice is given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such experiments argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be equally respected. Therefore, they believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientist should use alternative methods of research. On the other hand, a fact to support animal-based experiments is that there is little chance of finding satisfying substitutions for animals. Animals bear a close resemblance to humans, either in behavior or in cell structure. In addition, they respond to external disturbances such as electrical shock nearly in the same manner as humans do. Many evidences suggest that most of what people know about themselves, such as pain, stress or nutrition, is based on experiments of animals. Therefore, animal testing proves one of the main approaches to predict the risks when drugs or other products are used on humans. In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
and citizens across the world are facing an ethical dilemma over the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in laboratory
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
for drugs and other products. While I tend towards the viewpoint that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
, I would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
support a limited amount of animal-based
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
for the well-being of humanity.

On the one hand, there are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
ethical arguments against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
a common example of this practice, laboratory mice is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
an illness
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the effectiveness of a new drug can
be measured
. Opponents of such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
have no right to subject
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to this kind of trauma, and that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of all creatures should be
equally
respected.
Therefore
, they believe that the benefits to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientist should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
alternative methods of research.

On the other hand
, a fact to support animal-based
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
is that there is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
chance of finding satisfying substitutions for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animals
bear a close resemblance to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
, either in behavior or in cell structure.
In addition
, they respond to external disturbances such as electrical shock
nearly
in the same manner as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
do.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
evidences suggest that most of what
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
know about themselves, such as pain,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stress
or nutrition,
is based
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Therefore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
proves one of the main approaches to predict the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risks
when drugs or other products are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
on humans.

In conclusion
, it seems to me that it would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to ban
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for vital medical research until
equally
effective alternatives have
been developed
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
22Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 6

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
268 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts