Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. Do you agree or disagree? v.2

Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. v. 2
It is said that government funding for education should give preference to science-based subjects over others, in an attempt to help boost a country’s future development and progress. Although an increase in scientific developments can have many benefits to national progress, this essay disagrees that science is the primary contributor. There is no question that the advent of modern science has brought with it a number of improvements to the way that countries and societies function. For example, increases in electrical and computer based technologies have led to much more streamlined and efficient workplaces. Computers and computerized machinery can now do the work of what would have previously been carried out by humans, allowing greater efficiency and higher productivity output. Another benefit that modern science has granted is the development of renewable energy. Sources of renewable energy, such as solar and wind generated power, are beginning to help ease the planet’s reliance on fossil fuels. That being said, an increase in scientific education and development must not be the main measure of a country’s progress. It can be seen that the study of many other disciplines of education can also attribute to a countries progress. Take, for example, the Arts and Humanities. Subjects such as History and Philosophy have allowed us to gain a better understanding of humanity and can help to gain more insight into how we can move forward as a race. Other subjects such as the Arts, allow societies and individuals to express themselves creatively through mediums such as music, film and other art forms. It can be argued that this can also help to improve the quality of people’s lives and therefore help towards a countries overall development. In conclusion, although developments in science have led to many beneficial advantages for most countries, science alone is not the key contributor to a country’s progress. In my opinion, most countries would benefit greater from a more well-rounded education, with emphasis on all disciplines, not only that of science.
It
is said
that
government
funding for
education
should give preference to science-based subjects over others, in an attempt to
help
boost a
country’s
future
development
and
progress
. Although an increase in scientific
developments
can have
many
benefits to national
progress
, this essay disagrees that
science
is the primary contributor.

There is no question that the advent of modern
science
has brought with it a number of improvements to the way that
countries
and societies function.
For example
, increases in electrical and computer based technologies have led to much more streamlined and efficient workplaces. Computers and computerized machinery can
now
do the work of what would have previously
been carried
out by humans, allowing greater efficiency and higher productivity output. Another benefit that modern
science
has granted is the
development
of renewable energy. Sources of renewable energy, such as solar and wind generated power, are beginning to
help
ease
the planet’s reliance on fossil fuels.

That
being said
, an increase in scientific
education
and
development
must
not be the main measure of a
country’s
progress
. It can be
seen
that the study of
many
other
disciplines of
education
can
also
attribute to a
countries
progress
. Take,
for example
, the Arts and Humanities. Subjects such as History and Philosophy have
allowed
us to gain a better understanding of humanity and can
help
to gain more insight into how we can
move
forward as a race.
Other
subjects such as the Arts,
allow
societies and individuals to express themselves
creatively
through mediums such as music, film and
other
art forms. It can
be argued
that this can
also
help
to
improve
the quality of
people
’s
lives
and
therefore
help
towards a
countries
overall
development.

In conclusion
, although
developments
in
science
have led to
many
beneficial advantages for most
countries
,
science
alone is not the key contributor to a
country’s
progress
. In my opinion, most
countries
would benefit greater from a more well-rounded
education
, with emphasis on all disciplines, not
only
that of
science
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
36Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes
Learn everything you can, anytime you can, from anyone you can; there will always come a time when you will be grateful you did.
Sarah Caldwell

IELTS essay Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts