Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. v.5

Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 5
Animals have been the routine specimen human to test on medication, which is successful in the treatment for the patient as no human taking part in any guinea tests. However, some people believe that the animals can feel the pains and the boundary between what is moral or immoral in these tests is thin, that people really want to get rid the feeling out of the animals. In this essay I will delve into the both views and see the right choice for us. First of all, animal testing may sound cruel to them, but it can be a necessary sacrifice as we can protect our species. It is a fact that scientists have no moral rights to cause any discomfort or pain to the animals. However, it is cleared that reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Therefore, we should make the less pain for the animals; and in order to measure the discomfort of the tested animals, such as mice or pigs, there are actually some scientific methods that can modify the amount of specimen and doses that inject to them. From there, a limited amount of animal experiments can be easily controlled under human’s hands and less cruelty can create to the animals. On the other hand, these methods should be eliminated as they really put animals in severe pain. Although the animals are not developed like human, they also have an equal right to live as us. Ethical arguments have been mentioned against the animal testing, since humans have no rights to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and the lives of all creatures should be respected. If the medications move on for further development, the animals should be let alone. Instead, solutions can be included such as computerized human, patient simulators and In vitro testing which is defined as a research using human cells and tissues, can be used. In conclusion, animals can be great experimental subjects for our medications. However, because of the ethical arguments forwards the animals, the research should be considered and replaced with alternative methods.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animals
have been the routine specimen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
on medication, which is successful in the treatment for the patient as no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
taking part in any guinea
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
.
However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
can feel the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pains
and the boundary between what is moral or immoral in these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
is thin, that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
really
want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
rid the feeling out of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. In this essay I will delve into the both views and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
choice for us.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing may sound cruel to them,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it can be a necessary sacrifice as we can protect our species. It is a fact that scientists have no moral
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
to cause any discomfort or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pain
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
However
, it
is cleared
that reliable alternatives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experimentation may not always be available.
Therefore
, we should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pain
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
; and in order to measure the discomfort of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, such as mice or pigs, there are actually
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
scientific methods that can modify the amount of specimen and doses that inject to them. From there, a limited amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments can be
easily
controlled under
Possible typo. Did you mean: "human hands"?
human’s hands
and less cruelty can create to the animals.

On the other hand
, these methods should
be eliminated
as they
really
put
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in severe
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pain
. Although the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are not developed like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
, they
also
have an equal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
as us. Ethical arguments have
been mentioned
against the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing, since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
have no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
to subject
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to this kind of trauma, and the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of all creatures should
be respected
. If the medications
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
on for
further
development, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
alone.
Instead
, solutions can
be included
such as computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
, patient simulators and In
Possible spelling mistake found.
vitro
testing which
is defined
as a research using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
cells and tissues, can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
can be great experimental subjects for our medications.
However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the ethical arguments forwards the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, the research should
be considered
and replaced with alternative methods.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
31Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS essay Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
348 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts