With the rapid development of the digital era, newspapers and television channels that reporting current affairs are powerful among the public. Some people argue that this progress is a bad influence on society. This essay will argue why I completely disagree with this statement.
News channels have influenced society in many positive ways. To begin with, the press has provided news reliable and informative in up-to-the-minute which are leading the public to realize the newest affairs around the world. This leads the public to feel a sense of belonging to the global village. Secondly, the media is working as a bridge between the government and the people. Although most of the folks have never met administrators and the president, they could have access to knowledge through watching TV or reading newspapers to understand the policy or update from the government. Furthermore, media played an important role in the multicultural development which helps people to have a great understanding between nations. Thus, by far without this developed media people can just know a few about this world.
On the other hand, the privacy of celebrities and the contents of some media are a trend to a negative development. Some journalists are more likely to expose the celebrities’ privacy to meet people’ circuity which sometimes impacts the celebrity’s daily life. However, from my point of the view, as a public person that taking a super salary have to access this sort of risk. In term of the contents of some media which include violent and sexual images have complained that have a significantly negative influence on children. From my counter-argument of this statement, with recent technology, such images are totally avoidable if they do not want to see them.
In conclusion, although there are two different voices about news channels, the importance of new media outweigh the disadvantage of some minor issues. Personally, I strongly agree with the increasingly powerful news channels is a positive development.
With the rapid
development
of the digital era, newspapers and television
channels
that reporting
current
affairs are powerful among the
public
.
Some
people
argue that this progress is a
bad
influence on society. This essay will argue why I completely disagree with this statement.
News
channels
have influenced society in
many
positive
ways. To
begin
with, the press has provided
news
reliable and informative in up-to-the-minute which are leading the
public
to realize the newest affairs around the world. This leads the
public
to feel a sense of belonging to the global village.
Secondly
, the
media
is working as a bridge between the
government
and the
people
. Although most of the folks have never met administrators and the president, they could have access to knowledge through watching TV or reading newspapers to understand the policy or update from the
government
.
Furthermore
,
media
played an
important
role in the multicultural
development
which
helps
people
to have a great understanding between nations.
Thus
, by far without this developed
media
people
can
just
know a few about this world.
On the other hand
, the privacy of celebrities and the contents of
some
media
are a trend to a
negative
development
.
Some
journalists are more likely to expose the celebrities’ privacy to
meet
people’
circuity which
sometimes
impacts the celebrity’s daily life.
However
, from my point of the view, as a
public
person that taking a super salary
have to
access this sort of
risk
. In term of the contents of
some
media
which include violent and sexual images have complained that have a
significantly
negative
influence on children. From my counter-argument of this statement, with recent technology, such images are
totally
avoidable if they do not want to
see
them.
In conclusion
, although there are two
different
voices about
news
channels
, the importance of
new
media
outweigh the disadvantage of
some
minor issues.
Personally
, I
strongly
agree
with the
increasingly
powerful
news
channels
is a
positive
development
.