most societies has its homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money. v.4
most societies has its homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money. v. 4
In today's world, there are lots of people who cannot afford a house for themselves. Some people believe that these people could be benefited only by supporting economically. This essay will discuss why I completely disagree with this proposition because there are alternatives to support these people, such as education, meals, employment, and etc.
To embark on, firstly, the main objective of communities is to provide residence to people who are not capable enough to live in their own house and stay in slum areas. Just providing them fund might not suffice the purpose of giving them a shelter to live as it is not necessary that these individuals are going to utilise the offered amount for constructing a home, instead there is a possibility of misusing that money. For instance, some people in my country usually do not use the money in an appropriate way, especially it is offered as a help. Hence, rather than helping economically, one can get free education and meals as a support.
Moreover, the reason why only money would not be beneficial for poor people, especially, who do not have their own house is that, they barely would understand the value of earning until they do it themselves. For instance, money offered for one time would be limited one. However, employment will offer funding for the long run. Hence, providing employment instead of money would give them a better chance to arrange a house.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed why only money would no be a great help for citizens without home because this money offered might be misused by people and it will be a static for just a certain time period. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the proposition that economic help alone would not be useful for people who does not have a home
In
today
's world, there are lots of
people
who
cannot afford a
house
for themselves.
Some
people
believe that these
people
could
be benefited
only
by supporting
economically
. This essay will discuss why I completely disagree with this proposition
because
there are alternatives to support these
people
, such as education, meals, employment,
and etc
.
To embark on,
firstly
, the main objective of communities is to provide residence to
people
who
are not capable
enough
to
live
in their
own
house
and stay in slum areas.
Just
providing them fund might not suffice the purpose of giving them a shelter to
live
as it is not necessary that these individuals are going to
utilise
the
offered
amount for constructing a home,
instead
there is a possibility of misusing that
money
.
For instance
,
some
people
in my country
usually
do not
use
the
money
in an appropriate way
,
especially
it is
offered
as a
help
.
Hence
,
rather
than helping
economically
, one can
get
free education and meals as a support.
Moreover
, the reason why
only
money
would not be beneficial for poor
people
,
especially
,
who
do not have their
own
house
is that, they
barely
would understand the value of earning until they do it themselves.
For instance
,
money
offered
for one time would
be limited
one.
However
, employment will offer funding for the long run.
Hence
, providing employment
instead
of
money
would give them a better chance to arrange a
house
.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed why
only
money
would
no
be a great
help
for citizens without home
because
this
money
offered
might
be misused
by
people
and it will be a static for
just
a certain time period. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the proposition that economic
help
alone would not be useful for
people
who
does
not have a
home
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
24Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes