Some would argue that teenagers should be given money as a gift, while others oppose it. While money could fulfil some of their essential needs, I believe that youngsters could misuse it to buy materials that have negative impact on them if given as a present.
On the one hand, when youth between 13 to 19 are availed of a certain amount of finance, they could use it to spend on some of their important necessity. This is to say that there are certain items that they need but are ashamed of asking it to their parents or relatives. For example, girls in Nepal are hesitant to discuss about their puberty and ashamed of their natural menstruation cycle, which forces them to use old clothes as a sanitary pad, that may contain bacteria, instead of safer products available in the market. However, I believe that most mothers are open about these things with their teenage daughters and provide such items without being asked.
On the other hand, youngsters use the money, given as a present, to purchase unnecessary item that may pose a negative effect. This means youth think that gifted money is to fulfil their personal desire and they are not required to explain their parents where they have spent that amount. Consequently, they may end up buying the materials they are not supposed to have or use. For example, a recent survey revealed that 30% of the teens in the USA spend their extra pocket money to buy illegal medicines; so a financial gift would only encourage them to do more and others to start. Therefore, allowing teenagers to own money as a gift tend them to use it in a subject that may have a detrimental effect on them.
In conclusion, although the financial gift is crucial for some teenagers because it enables them to purchace an item that is extremely important for them, I believe that most of them would misuse it in the product that have adverse result on them.
Some
would argue that
teenagers
should be
given
money
as a
gift
, while others oppose it. While
money
could fulfil
some
of their essential needs, I believe that youngsters could misuse it to
buy
materials that have
negative
impact on them if
given
as a present.
On the one hand, when youth
between 13 to 19
are availed
of a certain amount of finance, they could
use
it to spend on
some
of their
important
necessity. This is to say that there are certain
items
that they need
but
are ashamed
of asking it to their parents or relatives.
For example
, girls in Nepal are hesitant to
discuss about their
puberty and ashamed of their natural menstruation cycle, which forces them to
use
old
clothes as a sanitary pad, that may contain bacteria,
instead
of safer products available in the market.
However
, I believe that most mothers are open about these things with their teenage daughters and provide such
items
without
being asked
.
On the other hand
, youngsters
use
the
money
,
given
as a present, to
purchase
unnecessary
item
that may pose a
negative
effect. This means youth
think
that gifted
money
is to fulfil their personal
desire and
they are not required to
explain
their parents where they have spent that amount.
Consequently
, they may
end
up buying the materials they are not supposed to have or
use
.
For example
, a recent survey revealed that 30% of the teens in the USA spend their extra pocket
money
to
buy
illegal medicines;
so
a financial
gift
would
only
encourage them to do more
and others
to
start
.
Therefore
, allowing
teenagers
to
own
money
as a
gift
tend them to
use
it in a subject that may have a detrimental effect on them.
In conclusion
, although the financial
gift
is crucial for
some
teenagers
because
it enables them to
purchace
an
item
that is
extremely
important
for them, I believe that most of them would misuse it in the product that have adverse result on them.