.
Sample Essay
Approval of the medicines for human use is a tedious process which involves a series of tests often performed on animals. While some people support this idea because it makes drugs safer for human consumption, others believe that it is an unethical practice. Personally, I am in favour of the idea that medicines should be tested in all possible scenarios before being released to the public.
Those against animal experimentation argue that animals have the same rights as human beings because they are the outcome of the same evolution process through which humans came into existence. Infecting them with viruses and exposing them to bacteria, to create a conducive environment to test a chemical substance may cause excruciating pain to these lab animals. Any failed test can mean that the subject either loses its precious life or suffers for the rest of its existence, and understandably, some people are against what they consider an immoral practice.
Nonetheless, if a drug is released into the market without a thorough end-to-end testing, it could cause severe damage to anyone who may consume it. Every day a large number of animals are being mercilessly killed by humans for their mere flesh and skin. There isn’t a big difference between killing an animal for food and sacrificing its life for testing a chemical composition, because both actions are helping the human race to survive. What’s more, the life of one animal used to test a life-saving drug could help many people live. This is why a large number of people believe that testing drugs on animals is a matter of survival.
To sum up, there are valid reasons why animal testing seems cruel and unacceptable to some, and crucial to others. In my opinion, even though animals subjected to testing may suffer, it is a necessary step to ensure the healing power of a drug.
.
Sample Essay
Approval of the medicines for
human
use
is a tedious process which involves a series of
tests
often
performed on
animals
. While
some
people
support this
idea
because
it
makes
drugs
safer for
human
consumption, others believe that it is an unethical practice.
Personally
, I am in
favour
of the
idea
that medicines should be
tested
in all possible scenarios
before
being released
to the public.
Those against
animal
experimentation argue that
animals
have the same rights as
human
beings
because
they are the outcome of the same evolution process through which
humans
came into existence. Infecting them with viruses and exposing them to bacteria, to create a conducive environment to
test
a chemical substance may cause excruciating pain to these lab
animals
. Any failed
test
can mean that the subject either loses its precious life or suffers for the rest of its existence, and
understandably
,
some
people
are against what they consider an immoral practice.
Nonetheless, if a
drug
is released
into the market without a thorough
end
-to-
end
testing
, it could cause severe damage to anyone who may consume it. Every day
a large number of
animals
are being
mercilessly
killed by
humans
for their mere flesh and skin. There isn’t a
big
difference between killing an
animal
for food and sacrificing its life for
testing
a chemical composition,
because
both actions are helping the
human
race to survive. What’s more, the life of one
animal
used
to
test
a life-saving
drug
could
help
many
people
live
. This is why
a large number of
people
believe that
testing
drugs
on
animals
is a matter of survival.
To sum up, there are valid reasons why
animal
testing
seems cruel and unacceptable to
some
, and crucial to others. In my opinion,
even though
animals
subjected to
testing
may suffer, it is a necessary step to ensure the healing power of a
drug
.