Nowadays, the pace of changes in the world of technology is amazing. These speedy changes lead entertainment industry to become ahead of many sectors in our lives. A fastest growing popularity of stars in different fields is a controversial topic that is discussed almost everywhere in the world. To my way of thinking, people who are getting fame in the 21st century are highly-paid workers.
In one hand, I reckon that people are equal in every aspect so as our professions. Owing to the fact that we can divide employment world into two sectors we will understand that professions that serve mass entertainment requirements and whose working process can be seen on television are highly profitable, compared to those who are working in offices for long hours. Consequently, people show them less respect. In fact, these kinds of professionals can be more beneficial for society as well as for government than those who are famous from televisions. For instance, if we compare architects salary to famous musicians or pop stars income we can vividly see a sharp difference between them. If a senior architect's whole year's income makes up approximately $70, 000, a famous pop star can earn two times more money by performing in a single concert.
On another hand, a vast majority of TV stars such as movie stars or even sports icons have appropriate financial rewards that accurately suit its working standards as well as their high professionalism. For instance, Emma Watson who is a worldwide famous star should have a high income. We cannot deny the fact that high financial rewards can encourage people to improve themselves in terms of career. Some people believe that this kind of attitude will lead our entertainment industry to industrial prosperity.
In conclusion, I would like to say that after discussing both sides of argument my sentiments are on par with the idea that entertainers who are famous from the blue screen should have equal financial rewards as people working at other important sectors.
Nowadays, the pace of
changes
in the world of technology is amazing. These speedy
changes
lead entertainment industry to become ahead of
many
sectors in our
lives
.
A
fastest growing popularity of
stars
in
different
fields is a controversial topic that
is discussed
almost everywhere in the world. To my way of thinking,
people
who
are getting fame in the 21st century are
highly
-paid workers.
In one hand, I reckon that
people
are equal in every aspect
so
as our professions. Owing to the fact that we can divide employment world into two sectors we will understand that professions that serve mass entertainment requirements and whose
working
process can be
seen
on television are
highly
profitable, compared to those
who
are
working
in offices for long hours.
Consequently
,
people
show
them less respect. In fact, these kinds of professionals can be more beneficial for society
as well
as for
government
than those
who
are
famous
from televisions.
For instance
, if we compare architects salary to
famous
musicians or pop
stars
income we can
vividly
see
a sharp difference between them. If a senior architect's whole year's income
makes
up approximately $70, 000, a
famous
pop star can earn two times more money by performing in a single concert.
On another hand, a vast majority of TV
stars
such as movie
stars
or even sports icons have appropriate financial rewards that
accurately
suit its
working
standards
as well
as their high professionalism.
For instance
, Emma Watson
who
is a worldwide
famous
star should have a high income. We cannot deny the fact that high financial rewards can encourage
people
to
improve
themselves in terms of career.
Some
people
believe that this kind of attitude will lead our entertainment industry to industrial prosperity.
In conclusion
, I would like to say that after discussing both sides of argument my sentiments are on par with the
idea
that entertainers
who
are
famous
from the blue screen should have equal financial rewards as
people
working
at other
important
sectors.