Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Countries should start using nuclear power as their main source of energy; fossil fuels (i. e. coal, oil and gas) are not going to last forever and nuclear power is the cheapest alternative. v.2

Countries should start using nuclear power as their main source of energy; fossil fuels (i. e. coal, oil and gas) are not going to last forever and nuclear power is the cheapest alternative. v. 2
At present many governments all over the world are putting forward a proposal for the new alternative source of energy production. The new solution for the energy generation consists of the replacement of the traditional energy production with nuclear power. Those that support the nuclear power introduction believe that as a more environmentally beneficial solution, it can cope with the pollution problems, while the opponents argue that there are numerous drawbacks that come with the new energy production. I am very doubtful whether the advantages are truly beneficial and I am of the opinion that drawbacks overweight the benefits. There are several reasons for the use of nuclear power. Firstly, due to its ability to emit far fewer greenhouse gases during the energy generation, it makes the nuclear power plants far more environmentally friendly and positive for the whole society. Also, some are of the opinion that the nuclear power plants have a much larger power-generating capacity which enables the production for bigger industrial areas, such as big cities and regions. However, this new energy progress surely brings much more drawbacks. First of all, because of its size as an infrastructural project, it brings a problem of high cost. Moreover, for the construction of such a large energy plants, subsidies are needed for the projecting and operation, as well as loan guarantees. Furthermore, there are great deals of high known risks that cannot be forgotten. For example, physical injuries, deaths and most importantly the high level of radiation produced from the nuclear waste and maintenance materials. Also, the research shows that the nuclear waste lasts from 200 to 500 thousand years, which negates the fact that is the pro-environmental solution. In conclusion, even if the nuclear power plants provide a vast of financial and energetic advantages, I truly believe that there are still a great deal of dangerous and contentious issues that come with it.
At present
many
governments
all over the world are putting forward a proposal for the
new
alternative source of
energy
production
. The
new
solution for the
energy
generation consists of the replacement of the traditional
energy
production
with nuclear
power
. Those that support the nuclear
power
introduction believe that as a more
environmentally
beneficial solution, it can cope with the pollution problems, while the opponents argue that there are numerous drawbacks that
come
with the
new
energy
production
. I am
very
doubtful whether the advantages are
truly
beneficial and
I am of the opinion that drawbacks overweight the benefits.

There are several reasons for the
use
of nuclear
power
.
Firstly
, due to its ability to emit far fewer greenhouse gases during the
energy
generation, it
makes
the nuclear
power
plants
far more
environmentally
friendly and
positive
for the whole society.
Also
,
some
are of the opinion that the nuclear
power
plants
have a much larger power-generating capacity which enables the
production
for bigger industrial areas, such as
big
cities and regions.

However
, this
new
energy
progress
surely
brings much more drawbacks.
First of all
,
because
of its size as an infrastructural project, it brings a problem of high cost.
Moreover
, for the construction of such a large
energy
plants
, subsidies
are needed
for the projecting and operation,
as well
as loan guarantees.
Furthermore
, there are great deals of high known
risks
that cannot
be forgotten
.
For example
, physical injuries, deaths and most
importantly
the high level of radiation produced from the nuclear waste and maintenance materials.
Also
, the research
shows
that the nuclear waste lasts from 200 to 500 thousand years, which negates the fact
that is
the pro-environmental solution.

In conclusion
, even if the nuclear
power
plants
provide a vast of financial and energetic advantages, I
truly
believe that there are
still
a great deal of
dangerous
and contentious issues that
come
with it.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
25Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes

IELTS essay Countries should start using nuclear power as their main source of energy; fossil fuels (i. e. coal, oil and gas) are not going to last forever and nuclear power is the cheapest alternative. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
315 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts