While it is believed that higher fuel cost may improve matters, I would argue that this is not an optimal solution, and there are other ways to mitigate the impacts on the environment.
A rise in the price of petrol would disadvantage individuals and the society as a whole. If gas prices surged, there would likely be significant increases in the costs of other household appliances and products. However, these people rely heavily on menial jobs and agriculture to make ends meet. Therefore, they would have to make cutbacks in household budgets to make the most of their incomes. From the perspective of society, as fuel costs soar, consumer sentiment plummets. Consequently, people would put off discretionary purchases, namely recreational activities and accessories, as they only have a limited ability to change how much gasoline they consume. This can have detrimental impacts on business and weaken the economy.
Alternatively, there are better solutions to environmental problems. Firstly, governments should impose restraint policies on cars and other motorized vehicles during peak periods. This is known as road space rationing which has successfully reduced traffic congestions and carbon emissions in cities, namely Beijing and Sao Paulo. Secondly, governments should also improve and expand the public transport system. The problems with public transport at the moment are that they are inconvenient and people have limited access to them in some regions. Therefore, solving these problems can minimize the use of private vehicles, which can be done by offering membership cards and vouchers, cleaning the vehicles frequently, etc.
In conclusion, while increasing the price of fuel has serious consequences, there are more efficient measures to tackle environmental problems.
While it
is believed
that higher fuel cost may
improve
matters, I would argue that this is not an optimal solution, and there are other ways to mitigate the impacts on the environment.
A rise in the price of petrol would disadvantage individuals and the society as a whole. If gas prices surged, there would likely be significant increases in the costs of other household appliances and products.
However
, these
people
rely
heavily
on menial jobs and agriculture to
make
ends
meet
.
Therefore
, they would
have to
make
cutbacks in household budgets to
make
the most of their incomes. From the perspective of society, as fuel costs soar, consumer sentiment plummets.
Consequently
,
people
would put off discretionary
purchases
,
namely
recreational activities and accessories, as they
only
have a limited ability to
change
how much gasoline they consume. This can have detrimental impacts on business and weaken the economy.
Alternatively
, there are better solutions to environmental
problems
.
Firstly
,
governments
should impose restraint policies on cars and other motorized vehicles during peak periods. This
is known
as road space rationing which has
successfully
reduced
traffic congestions and carbon emissions in cities,
namely
Beijing and
Sao Paulo
.
Secondly
,
governments
should
also
improve
and expand the public transport system. The
problems
with public transport at the moment are that they are inconvenient and
people
have limited access to them in
some
regions.
Therefore
, solving these
problems
can minimize the
use
of private vehicles, which can
be done
by offering membership cards and vouchers, cleaning the vehicles
frequently
, etc.
In conclusion
, while increasing the price of fuel has serious consequences, there are more efficient measures to tackle environmental
problems
.