With the ever-increasing competitiveness among university graduates, many universities are figuring out the best method to assess a student academic achievement. Some people believe that handwritten examinations are not the most effective way to reflect students’ academic potential, others maintain that it is actually the best way to reveal students’ achievement. This essay will discuss both views as well as why only holding written examinations are not the best way to do so.
People who think “Pen and paper” examinations are not the best argue that it cannot test the practical skills of a student. For instance, students who study electrical engineering not only need to learn the knowledge from the textbooks, but also have to do some practical experiments such as building circuits and power supplies. Without the practical examinations, we cannot examine the practical skills of those students and whether how to apply what they have learnt into reality. Hence, they prefer the best way is examinations should be held with a right balance between written and practical.
In contrast, some maintain that “pen and paper” assessments are the most basic requirement for students to study further. They claim that if a student can’t even pass a written exam, he will not have enough knowledge to apply practically and won’t be qualified in the future. As an example, doctors have to first learn the knowledge in the textbooks to build up their confidence. Without knowledge they are unable to cure the patients. Allowing a doctor who failed in his written exams to proceed a surgery would become a tragedy to both sides. Therefore, they argue that “pen and paper” examinations are the first step of assessing students’ educational achievement and they are the best method.
This essay discussed that the importance of holding a practical exam and also why “pen and paper” examinations are essential to assess students. In my opinion, both sides come up with a strong argument. Although I believe that “pen and paper” exams are necessary, we also need to find a right balance between written and practical exams in order to not to create an “exam-machine” to the world.
With the ever-increasing competitiveness among university graduates,
many
universities are figuring out the
best
method to assess a
student
academic achievement.
Some
people
believe that handwritten
examinations
are not the most effective way to reflect
students’
academic potential, others maintain that it is actually the
best
way to reveal
students’
achievement. This essay will discuss both views
as well as
why
only
holding
written
examinations
are not the
best
way to do
so
.
People
who
think
“Pen
and paper”
examinations
are not the
best
argue that it cannot
test
the
practical
skills
of a
student
.
For instance
,
students
who study electrical engineering not
only
need to learn the
knowledge
from the textbooks,
but
also
have to
do
some
practical
experiments such as building circuits and power supplies. Without the
practical
examinations
, we cannot examine the
practical
skills
of those
students
and whether how to apply what they have
learnt
into reality.
Hence
, they prefer the
best
way is
examinations
should
be held
with a right balance between
written
and practical.
In contrast
,
some
maintain that
“pen
and paper” assessments are the most basic requirement for
students
to study
further
. They claim that if a
student
can’t even pass a
written
exam, he will not have
enough
knowledge
to apply
practically
and won’t
be qualified
in the future. As an example, doctors
have to
first
learn the
knowledge
in the textbooks to build up their confidence. Without
knowledge they
are unable to cure the patients. Allowing a doctor who failed in his
written
exams to proceed a surgery would become a tragedy to both sides.
Therefore
, they argue that
“pen
and paper”
examinations
are the
first
step of assessing
students’
educational
achievement and
they are the
best
method.
This essay discussed that the importance of holding a
practical
exam and
also
why
“pen
and paper”
examinations
are essential to assess
students
. In my opinion, both sides
come
up with a strong argument. Although I believe that
“pen
and paper” exams are necessary, we
also
need to find a right balance between
written
and
practical
exams in order
to not to
create an “exam-machine” to the world.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
43Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes