Some people opine that students should be supported to evaluate or criticize teachers, while others are worried that these acts would lead to a chaotic classroom. I personally side with the former view because this two-way communication helps instructors refine their teaching methods and enables students to become more involved in the lessons.
To begin with, educational standards can be raised because instructors can modify their ways of delivering lessons based on the students’ feedbacks. If, for example, the class is slow, it will be ineffective for instructors teach too fast so that most students would fail to retain the information. Therefore, based on the comments of students, lecturers would find it easier to know the appropriate speed of the lesson is appropriate for the class, and adjust themselves to their students. This would result in enhanced pedagogical methods of teachers.
Furthermore, I believe giving students the freedom in expressing their thoughts and feelings would enable them to become more proactive. For instance, many countries are promoting students-centred teaching with two-way communication, where open discussions between teachers and students are encouraged. This approach has a clear advantage of making students become more involved in studying. Increased participation in classroom activities helps pupils understand and memorize lessons faster, which eventually improves the educational outcomes.
In conclusion, I believe allowing students to make judgement on teachers would result in better pedagogical methods of the instructors and increased engagement of pupils in lessons. Consequently, I prefer the opinion that this measure should be encouraged to enhance educational quality, despite the risks of disrespect and indiscipline.
Some
people
opine that
students
should
be supported
to evaluate or criticize teachers, while others
are worried
that these acts would lead to a chaotic classroom. I
personally
side with the former view
because
this two-way communication
helps
instructors
refine their teaching methods and enables
students
to become more involved in the lessons.
To
begin
with, educational standards can
be raised
because
instructors
can modify their ways of delivering
lessons
based on the
students’
feedbacks. If,
for example
, the
class
is slow, it will be ineffective for
instructors
teach too
fast
so
that most
students
would fail to retain the information.
Therefore
, based on the comments of
students
, lecturers would find it easier to know the appropriate speed of the
lesson
is appropriate for the
class
, and adjust themselves to their
students
. This would result in enhanced pedagogical methods of teachers.
Furthermore
, I believe giving
students
the freedom in expressing their thoughts and feelings would enable them to become more proactive.
For instance
,
many
countries are promoting
students-centred
teaching with two-way communication, where open discussions between teachers and
students
are encouraged
. This approach has a
clear
advantage of making
students
become more involved in studying. Increased participation in classroom activities
helps
pupils understand and memorize
lessons
faster, which
eventually
improves
the educational outcomes.
In conclusion
, I believe allowing
students
to
make
judgement on teachers would result in better pedagogical methods of the
instructors
and increased engagement of pupils in
lessons
.
Consequently
, I prefer the opinion that this measure should
be encouraged
to enhance educational quality, despite the
risks
of disrespect and indiscipline.