The idea, who is responsible for the preservation of the environment, has sparked much debate in recent years. Some individuals contend that it is the government, who should take adequate steps, while others opine that every citizen of the country ought to understand their role in saving the ecosystem. Notwithstanding, this discourse will delve into these viewpoints, and subsequently put forward my own perspective accordingly.
Admittedly, the proponents of the view of individuals’ role in sustaining the environment have their own justification. The rationale behind their argument might be that it is the human whose actions have resulted in the deterioration of the environment. So, if, as a responsible human, we start to take preventive steps in order to save the ecosystem, then it will have an enormous impact on the ecosystem. In India, to epitomize, people have switched from petrol vehicles to electric vehicles, so that the emission of the poisonous gases can be controlled.
However, taking a look from the flip side, could the contenders of the school of thought that postulate that government’s role in preserving the ecosystem is pivotal be absolutely right? Certainly, the justification for their argument is much likely that the government can impose laws and outlaw the use of certain elements such as plastic, petroleum products. Moreover, the government should promote the usage of environment- friendly products. Not only does this lead to better conditions to live in, but it will also prevent deadly diseases from spreading.
In conclusion, having explored both sides of the arguments, I reiterate that both individuals and the government should share the responsibility of saving the environment. However, I consent to the hilt that the government’s role in preserving the ecosystem is indispensable, and the government’s actions can impact this on a larger scale.
The
idea
, who is responsible for the preservation of the
environment
, has sparked much debate in recent years.
Some
individuals contend that it is the
government
, who should take adequate steps, while others opine that every citizen of the country ought to understand their
role
in saving the ecosystem. Notwithstanding, this discourse will delve into these viewpoints, and
subsequently
put forward my
own
perspective
accordingly
.
Admittedly
, the proponents of the view of individuals’
role
in sustaining the
environment
have their
own
justification. The rationale behind their argument might be that it is the human whose actions have resulted in the deterioration of the
environment
.
So
, if, as a responsible human, we
start
to take preventive steps in order to save the ecosystem, then it will have an enormous impact on the ecosystem. In India, to epitomize,
people
have switched from petrol vehicles to electric vehicles,
so
that the emission of the poisonous gases can
be controlled
.
However
, taking a look from the flip side, could the contenders of the school of
thought
that postulate that
government’s
role
in preserving the ecosystem is pivotal be
absolutely
right?
Certainly
, the justification for their argument is much likely that the
government
can impose laws and outlaw the
use
of certain elements such as plastic, petroleum products.
Moreover
, the
government
should promote the usage of
environment-
friendly products. Not
only
does this lead to better conditions to
live
in,
but
it will
also
prevent
deadly diseases from spreading.
In conclusion
, having explored both sides of the arguments, I reiterate that both individuals and the
government
should share the responsibility of saving the
environment
.
However
, I consent to the hilt that the
government’s
role
in preserving the ecosystem is indispensable, and the
government’s
actions can impact this on a larger scale.