A large number of people are currently opting to share their personal details with tech organizations in return for gaining access rights for various software programs. This essay suggests that the benefit of furnishing these sensitive information do not outweigh the drawbacks because such sharing facilitates data appropriation and there are some companies which provide these software packages for free, in any event.
Data appropriation is a form of exploitation because companies use data to create value without reasonably compensating individuals. The personal details of these individuals are used by data brokers who create massive personalized profiles, which are then sold in exchange of humongous amounts of money. These unholy practices enable businesses to build their wealth and power without the headache of providing any indemnification. For example, the New York Times reported in June 2019 that the data broker industry alone generates around $200 billion in annual revenue and not even 1% of it is actually ploughed back to individuals whose personal data is processed.
Despite this, there are numerous people who believe that uses of software products are unsustainable without capitulating to every unscrupulous demands of these tech giants, who own these application software. These people say that it is better to comply with the demands rather than lose access completely. To this, I would say that government should step-in and devise policies that debar data appropriators and only allow companies, which provide mutual benefit, to function. For example, companies such as Google and Facebook although collect personal details, pay users back with quite a number of free services.
In conclusion, although a greater proportion of individuals might be willing to supply their personal details to tech companies, it enables data appropriation and only corporations ensuring a win-win scenario should be allowed to operate.
A large number of
people
are
currently
opting to share their
personal
details
with tech organizations in return for gaining access rights for various
software
programs. This essay suggests that the benefit of furnishing these sensitive information do not outweigh the drawbacks
because
such sharing facilitates
data
appropriation and there are
some
companies
which provide these
software
packages for free, in any
event
.
Data appropriation is a form of exploitation
because
companies
use
data
to create value without
reasonably
compensating
individuals
. The
personal
details
of these
individuals
are
used
by
data
brokers who create massive personalized profiles, which are then sold
in exchange of
humongous amounts of money. These unholy practices enable businesses to build their wealth and power without the headache of providing any indemnification.
For example
, the New York Times reported in June 2019 that the
data
broker industry alone generates around $200 billion in annual revenue and not even 1% of it is actually
ploughed
back to
individuals
whose
personal
data
is processed
.
Despite this, there are numerous
people
who believe that
uses
of
software
products are unsustainable without capitulating to every unscrupulous demands of these tech giants, who
own
these application
software
. These
people
say that it is better to comply with the demands
rather
than lose access completely. To this, I would say that
government
should step-in and devise policies that debar
data
appropriators and
only
allow
companies
, which provide mutual benefit, to function.
For example
,
companies
such as Google and Facebook although collect
personal
details
, pay users back with quite a number of free services.
In conclusion
, although a greater proportion of
individuals
might be willing to supply their
personal
details
to tech
companies
, it enables
data
appropriation and
only
corporations ensuring a win-win scenario should be
allowed
to operate.