It is undeniable that after third world war, most of the developed nations like US, UK and Russia have been playing an essential role in fostering the economic growth of under developed nations. However, a considerable amount of people opines that this approach has a detrimental effect. In this essay i will examine both viewpoints in the following essay before forming any establishment.
First and foremost, there are several advantages of foreign treatment. Firstly, it helps in providing educational & employment opportunities to most of masses by setting up education institutes and Industries. Secondly, It would make them independent county as any service from strong country would strengthen their economy. Finally, Developed nations send expert doctors to underdeveloped to teach and guide regards to health practice. In other words, improved health practice results in less disease. For instance, Based on the recent WHO survey in 2001, countries like Peru and Maldives have started practicing a quality heath practice which has led to decrease in contagious disease from 85% to 44%.
On a contrary, Foreign care has a several positive impacts, but does come with some consequences. Any monetary support would force other officials of corruption, in other words, minimal amount would be used to right purpose and remaining would go their pockets. Favouring selected countries over others would cause a conflict. Lastly, financial compensation would leave poor countries with deeper debt. Therefore, proper surveillance should be measured before any actions.
In a nutshell, Giving financial and other forms of subsidy is a humanitarian act and has several benefits. However, critics are also correct in their own way. Therefore, the best way to address them is to coe up with a structural design and utmost focus on corruption
It is undeniable that after third world war, most of the developed nations like US, UK and Russia have been playing an essential role in fostering the economic growth of under developed nations.
However
, a considerable amount of
people
opines that this approach has a detrimental effect. In this essay
i
will examine both viewpoints in the following essay
before
forming any establishment.
First
and foremost, there are several advantages of foreign treatment.
Firstly
, it
helps
in providing educational & employment opportunities to
most of masses
by setting up education institutes and Industries.
Secondly
, It would
make
them independent county as any service from strong
country
would strengthen their economy.
Finally
, Developed nations
send
expert doctors
to underdeveloped to
teach and guide regards to health practice. In
other
words,
improved
health practice results in less disease.
For instance
, Based on the recent WHO survey in 2001,
countries
like Peru and Maldives have
started
practicing a quality heath practice which has led to decrease in contagious disease from 85% to 44%.
On a contrary, Foreign care has a several
positive
impacts,
but
does
come
with
some
consequences. Any monetary support would force
other
officials of corruption, in
other
words, minimal amount would be
used
to right purpose and remaining would go their pockets.
Favouring
selected
countries
over others would cause a conflict.
Lastly
, financial compensation would
leave
poor
countries
with deeper debt.
Therefore
, proper surveillance should
be measured
before
any actions.
In a nutshell, Giving financial and
other
forms of subsidy is a humanitarian act and has several benefits.
However
, critics are
also
correct in their
own
way.
Therefore
, the best way to address them is to
coe
up with a structural design and utmost focus on corruption