Suggested by some people is that person who committed severe illegal actions should be given the death punishment. On the other hand, to execute people because of their crimes is already non-relevant in society these days. This essay will discuss the positive and negative impacts of these statements and then the conclusion will be provided at the end of the essay.
To begin with, by carrying out the death sentence towards the particular perpetrator, whose man has done high level felony can give the society several advantages, two of which are giving the safe environment and reducing the level of misconduct to the community. Firstly, by executing the evil doers means that the evil human cannot go back to the real word. Thus no more wrong doing happen again in the human world. Secondly, the level of atrocity will be decreased because those who has the willing to do evil deeds are becoming scared. Eventually, they hopefully will think again their attitude and will come back as good person.
However, there are disadvantages of this kind of policy. Every human has their rights to live and at some points in their life, they could change, including the criminals. Not giving them the chance to redeem themselves could lead into the human rights violation. Moreover, legalized killing has been banned by some countries in this world, as they believe that the perpetrator can change by giving them the community service jobs.
In conclusion, death warrant is sometimes considered to be too cruel to be done, but I believe the kind of effort has to be done in order to make the peaceful world. I suggest that the judicial execution should be preserved because the benefits outweigh the drawbacks as explained in the paragraphs above.
Suggested by
some
people
is
that person who committed severe illegal actions should be
given
the death punishment.
On the other hand
, to execute
people
because
of their crimes is already non-relevant in society these days. This essay will discuss the
positive
and
negative
impacts of these statements and then the conclusion will
be provided
at the
end
of the essay.
To
begin
with, by carrying out the death sentence towards the particular perpetrator, whose
man
has done high level felony can give the society several advantages, two of which are giving the safe environment and reducing the level of misconduct to the community.
Firstly
, by executing the evil doers means that the evil
human
cannot go back to the real word.
Thus
no more
wrong
doing happen again in the
human
world.
Secondly
, the level of atrocity will
be decreased
because
those who has the willing
to do
evil deeds are becoming scared.
Eventually
, they
hopefully
will
think
again their attitude and will
come
back as
good
person.
However
, there are disadvantages of this kind of policy. Every
human
has
their
rights to
live
and at
some
points in their life, they could
change
, including the criminals. Not giving them the chance to redeem themselves could lead into the
human
rights violation.
Moreover
, legalized killing has
been banned
by
some
countries in this world, as they believe that the perpetrator can
change
by giving them the community service jobs.
In conclusion
, death warrant is
sometimes
considered to be too cruel to
be done
,
but
I believe the kind of effort
has to
be done
in order to
make
the peaceful world. I suggest that the judicial execution should
be preserved
because
the benefits outweigh the drawbacks as
explained
in the paragraphs above.