The technology of computer has provided numerous information so that investing money on public library's maintenance is considered wasteful. I, completely, disagree with this statement, although the internet has given myriads of data regarding any topic, reading books sitting in a library has its own benefits.
First and foremost, the computer is delivering lots of data through the internet. For that reason, people are able to fetch any types of news siting any Corner of the world. Furthermore, these days, people are very busy for their hectic schedule, so they cannot go to the library. Hence, only the internet is envisaged people’s reliable sources. Moreover, cities have also become congested for commuters who do not find any vehicles in the pick hour to reach the library. For example, studies have shown that 99% of people in mega cities are facing traffic problem, so most of the students leave the idea of going to the library. They prefer to study online.
On the contrary, public libraries are the best option to study for many reasons, so that the government needs to repair these libraries very often. The first reason is that older people are technophobes, they take an interest in the study sitting in the library. In addition, online sources are inaccurate and unreliable, while the information written on books is considered reliable. For instance, the people who wrote any news before the night and uploaded it at that time; however they may do this for their own interest. After that, if they see, their information is creating havoc. Then they can erase it. Such types of activities are impossible to published book. Therefore, public libraries are necessary and should be maintained by the government.
In conclusion, while online provides lots of information, people cannot deny the value of having a public library. From my perspective, I would say that the authorities should look after the public library for the sake of its authenticity.
The technology of computer has provided numerous
information
so
that investing money on
public
library's maintenance
is considered
wasteful. I, completely, disagree with this statement, although the internet has
given
myriads of data regarding any topic, reading books sitting in a library has its
own
benefits.
First
and foremost, the computer is delivering lots of data through the internet. For that reason,
people
are able to fetch any types of news siting any Corner of the world.
Furthermore
, these days,
people
are
very
busy for their hectic schedule,
so
they cannot go to the library.
Hence
,
only
the internet
is envisaged
people’s
reliable sources.
Moreover
, cities have
also
become congested for commuters who do not find any vehicles in the pick hour to reach the library.
For example
,
studies
have shown that 99% of
people
in mega cities are facing traffic problem,
so
most of the students
leave
the
idea
of going to the library. They prefer to
study
online.
On the contrary
,
public
libraries are the best option to
study
for
many
reasons,
so
that the
government
needs to repair these libraries
very
often
. The
first
reason is that older
people
are technophobes, they take an interest in the
study
sitting in the library.
In addition
, online sources are inaccurate and unreliable, while the
information
written on books
is considered
reliable.
For instance
, the
people
who wrote any news
before
the night and uploaded it at that time;
however
they may do this for their
own
interest. After that, if they
see
, their
information
is creating havoc. Then they can erase it. Such types of activities are impossible to published book.
Therefore
,
public
libraries are necessary and should
be maintained
by the
government
.
In conclusion
, while online provides lots of
information
,
people
cannot deny the value of having a
public
library. From my perspective, I would say that the authorities should look after the
public
library for the sake of its authenticity.