It is certainly true that there has been a huge change that took place in our ways of living with the time and it is now more developed and convenient than the past. Although I agree with the given statement but I do not agree completely. In my point of view, both of times have their own significances and people are similarly enjoyed and suffered in both eras.
First of all, regarding the past, a century ago people probably had a peaceful life. At that time, the proportion of crimes was significantly low. For example, folks usually lived in their community despite having any fear of burglary, stealing, kidnaping or terrorist attacks, which are the most common incidences at present. Secondly, a century ago, there was no problem of traffic congestions, as there were very negligible numbers of four wheelers running on British roads. Moreover, during that time family bonds were very strong. Such as, there was almost zero incidence of family breakdown while nowadays it is remarked as one kind of tradition.
In the present time, there is an improved lifestyle and this mostly enjoyed by the city people. This is due to the advent of modern technology. For instance, the internet brings people together and makes their work faster where within a millisecond people can send their message to people of another part of the world. To add with, health facilities have developed in such a way that, death ratio is remarkably low in developed countries because saving the life has now become very easy.
To conclude, I believe that, both of the eras bear its importance. In one hand, people are living in a high-tech era, where every single comfort is now in their hand but at the same time, family bonds are loosening gradually. On the other hand, a century ago, people lived a fearless and enjoyable life but without the lights of technological comfort and advent.
It is
certainly
true that there has been a huge
change
that took place in our ways of living with the
time
and it is
now
more developed and convenient than the past. Although I
agree
with the
given
statement
but
I do not
agree
completely. In my point of view, both of
times
have their
own
significances
and
people
are
similarly
enjoyed and suffered in both eras.
First of all
, regarding the past, a century ago
people
probably
had a peaceful life. At that
time
, the proportion of crimes was
significantly
low.
For example
, folks
usually
lived
in their community despite having any fear of burglary, stealing,
kidnaping
or terrorist attacks, which are the most common incidences at present.
Secondly
, a century ago, there was no problem of traffic congestions, as there were
very
negligible numbers of four
wheelers
running on British roads.
Moreover
, during that
time
family bonds were
very
strong. Such as, there was almost zero incidence of family breakdown while nowadays it
is remarked
as one kind of tradition.
In the present
time
, there is an
improved
lifestyle and this
mostly
enjoyed by the city
people
. This is due to the advent of modern technology.
For instance
, the internet brings
people
together and
makes
their work faster where within a millisecond
people
can
send
their message to
people
of another part of the world. To
add
with, health facilities have developed in such a way that, death ratio is
remarkably
low in
developed countries
because
saving the life has
now
become
very
easy.
To conclude
, I believe that, both of the eras bear its importance. In one hand,
people
are living in a high-tech era, where every single comfort is
now
in their hand
but
at the same
time
, family bonds are loosening
gradually
.
On the other hand
, a century ago,
people
lived
a fearless and enjoyable life
but
without the lights of technological comfort and advent.