Many individuals believe that the remuneration of teachers should be as per their students' results, while others don't feel like that and suggest it to be the way it is. I believe, the learner's result as output is subjective to his/her passion of interest rather than the mentor's skill. In this essay, I will argue for the unbiased pay-checks of teachers.
To begin with, for one set of people, the only yardstick to judge are the results. They consider it only by presuming it should be the same for every individual candidate in a subject. The latest technological analysis supports this idea, by stating that a skilful mentor can produce better results than in comparison to the others, who are not up to that supreme potential. For Instance, a study published by Times mentioned that in major Universities across the globe, teachers are paid 30% more than their peers, whose results are inevitably 50% better than their peers.
However, the grasping power of every candidate is very subjective as per his/her interest. The student, who is good at Maths, might not be the case in English subject; wherein the passion lies more in one over the other. Irrespective of trainer's commitment and competency in the subject, it is bound to be the distinguished results for each Individual in different courses. To illustrate, it is observed that same student has been able to achieve 90% in one subject, while only 60% in the other one.
To conclude, I believe, this noble profession to be kept intact, away from senseless discrimination of results bound pay checks despite of the fact, their fellow learners' captivity towards each individual subject. Therefore, this noble profession can be survived with this prejudice.
Many
individuals
believe that the remuneration of teachers should be as per their students'
results
, while others don't feel like that and suggest it to be the way it is. I believe, the learner's
result
as output is subjective to his/her passion of interest
rather
than the mentor's
skill
. In this essay, I will argue for the unbiased pay-
checks
of teachers.
To
begin
with, for one set of
people
, the
only
yardstick to judge are the
results
. They consider it
only
by presuming it should be the same for every
individual
candidate in a
subject
. The latest technological analysis supports this
idea
, by stating that a
skilful
mentor can produce better
results
than
in comparison
to the others, who are not up to that supreme potential.
For Instance
, a study published by Times mentioned that in major Universities across the globe, teachers
are paid
30% more than their peers, whose
results
are
inevitably
50% better than their peers.
However
, the grasping power of every candidate is
very
subjective as per his/her interest. The student, who is
good
at
Maths
, might not be the case in English
subject
; wherein the passion lies more in one over the
other
. Irrespective of trainer's commitment and competency in the
subject
, it
is bound
to be the distinguished
results
for each
Individual
in
different
courses. To illustrate, it
is observed
that same student has been able to achieve 90% in one
subject
, while
only
60% in the
other
one.
To conclude
, I believe, this noble profession to be
kept
intact, away from senseless discrimination of
results
bound pay
checks
despite of
the fact, their fellow learners' captivity towards each
individual
subject
.
Therefore
, this noble profession can
be survived
with this prejudice.