Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. v.1

It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. v. 1
It is true that many explorations are nominated to a person than to a group of people. Although all members of a team might have had equal influential roles to launch a new idea, only one is considered as the prime winner. I think this is because of three reasons, having a higher degree of qualifications, better networking or being more affluent. Obviously, the first reason behind it is that one individual, being accredited to innovation, usually have a higher level of certifications from a highly recognised institution. As a prime example, although Bill Gate’s team had a prominent role for his achievements in the computer software, he became more prosperous because his degree was from the Harvard College. Another factor is that some individuals have better networking. Many of scientists or linguistics, selected for the noble prize, surpassed their coworkers working with the same project due to having better communications. Participating in more international meetings, these experts can find more opportunities to expose their talents to famous scientists, helping them to achieve their innovation, while this person had only been one member of a whole team. Lastly, I think money talks. Clearly, wealth has an important role in overstating of the success of an individual. For instance, Anousheh Ansari, a female American-Iranian explorer, could become the first space tourist because she could afford twenty million dollars. Had not she been so rich, she would not have become so prosperous in this matter. She worked as a member of a team to prepare herself to fly by a spacecraft around the Earth, but she was the only one who was recognised by the press. In conclusion, instead of appreciating the whole team of innovators, sometimes a specific individual is chosen by the judge. I personally believe that having a better communication, educational position and financial backup are the reasons why one human can become more successful than the other members of a group.
It is true that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
explorations
are nominated
to a person than to a group of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. Although all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
might have had equal influential roles to launch a new
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one
is considered
as the prime winner. I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
this is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of three reasons, having a higher degree of qualifications,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
networking or being more affluent.

Obviously
, the
first
reason behind it is that one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individual
,
being accredited
to innovation,
usually
have a higher level of certifications from a
highly
Possible spelling mistake. 'recognised' is British English.
recognised
institution. As a prime example, although Bill Gate’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
had a prominent role for his achievements in the computer software, he became more prosperous
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
his degree was from the Harvard College.

Another factor is that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individuals
have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
networking.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
of scientists or linguistics, selected for the noble prize, surpassed their coworkers working with the same project due to having
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
communications. Participating in more international meetings, these experts can find more opportunities to expose their talents to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
scientists, helping them to achieve their innovation, while this person had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
been one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of a whole team.

Lastly
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
money talks.
Clearly
, wealth has an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
role in overstating of the success of an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individual
.
For instance
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Anousheh
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ansari
, a female American-Iranian explorer, could become the
first
space tourist
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
she could afford twenty million dollars. Had not she been
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
rich, she would not have become
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
prosperous in this matter. She worked as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
to prepare herself to
fly
by a spacecraft around the Earth,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
she was the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one who was
Possible spelling mistake. 'recognised' is British English.
recognised
by the press.

In conclusion
,
instead
of appreciating the whole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
of innovators,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
a specific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individual
is chosen
by the judge. I
personally
believe that having a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
communication, educational position and financial backup are the reasons why one human can become more successful than the other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
of a group.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
16Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
323 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts