In today' s world of work, it is a widely held perception that older employees lack the capability of adopting to the new work patterns and thus companies ought to employ younger workers. I, however, hold a different opinion that elderlies still have a significant role to play in the contemporary workplaces. In this essay, I will endeavour to justify my point and draw a conclusion thereof.
First and foremost, it is scientifically proven that flexing to changes is a matter of personality type rather than age. In fact, old employees can be adroit to be responsive to the new working process as well as younger workers. My 57-year-old uncle who works in a local bank can be a good example for this case. Despite his old age, he can compete with his young collaegues one-handedly in a company where dramatic alterations frequently occur.
Secondly, mature workforce in the workplace could be an invaluable tool. Senior employees' long-year experiences and managerial skills will be considerably benigicial to teach young workers how to cope with different situations at work. For instance, the vast majority big companies are now striving to keep their old staff in the team in order to polish up the immature members of the job market.
Yet, there are some induviduals who claim that youngesters are more preferable in employment as they are with the most enthusiasism and energy. Nonetheless, these could not possibly be directod into a best use without experienced workers' practical tutorials.
In conclusion, it is obvious that younger workers are claimed to be more suitable to the new changes at work. Nevertheless, I assert that it is crucial for companies to have older staff to put the young employees into the right path. 
In  
today&
#039; s world of  
work
, it is a  
widely
 held perception that older  
employees
 lack the capability of adopting to the new  
work
 patterns and  
thus
  companies
 ought to employ younger  
workers
. I,  
however
, hold a  
different
 opinion that  
elderlies
  still
 have a significant role to play in the contemporary workplaces. In this essay, I will  
endeavour
 to justify my point and draw a conclusion thereof. 
First
 and foremost, it is  
scientifically
 proven that flexing to  
changes
 is a matter of personality type  
rather
 than age. In fact,  
old
  employees
 can be adroit to be responsive to the new working process  
as well
 as younger  
workers
. My 57-year- 
old
 uncle who works in a local bank can be a  
good
 example for this case. Despite his  
old
 age, he can compete with his young  
collaegues
 one- 
handedly
 in a  
company
 where dramatic alterations  
frequently
 occur. 
Secondly
, mature workforce in the workplace could be an invaluable tool. Senior  
employees&
#039; long-year experiences and managerial  
skills
 will be  
considerably
  benigicial
 to teach young  
workers
 how to cope with  
different
 situations at  
work
.  
For instance
, the vast majority  
big
  companies
 are  
now
 striving to  
keep
 their  
old
 staff in the team in order to polish up the immature members of the job market. 
Yet
, there are  
some
  induviduals
 who claim that  
youngesters
 are more preferable in employment as they are with the most  
enthusiasism
 and energy. Nonetheless, these could not  
possibly
 be  
directod
 into  
a
 best  
use
 without experienced  
workers&
#039; practical tutorials. 
In conclusion
, it is obvious that younger  
workers
  are claimed
 to be more suitable to the new  
changes
 at  
work
.  
Nevertheless
, I assert that it is crucial for  
companies
 to have older staff to put the young  
employees
 into the right path. 
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
13Mistakes