In today' s world of work, it is a widely held perception that older employees lack the capability of adopting to the new work patterns and thus companies ought to employ younger workers. I, however, hold a different opinion that elderlies still have a significant role to play in the contemporary workplaces. In this essay, I will endeavour to justify my point and draw a conclusion thereof.
First and foremost, it is scientifically proven that flexing to changes is a matter of personality type rather than age. In fact, old employees can be adroit to be responsive to the new working process as well as younger workers. My 57-year-old uncle who works in a local bank can be a good example for this case. Despite his old age, he can compete with his young collaegues one-handedly in a company where dramatic alterations frequently occur.
Secondly, mature workforce in the workplace could be an invaluable tool. Senior employees' long-year experiences and managerial skills will be considerably benigicial to teach young workers how to cope with different situations at work. For instance, the vast majority big companies are now striving to keep their old staff in the team in order to polish up the immature members of the job market.
Yet, there are some induviduals who claim that youngesters are more preferable in employment as they are with the most enthusiasism and energy. Nonetheless, these could not possibly be directod into a best use without experienced workers' practical tutorials.
In conclusion, it is obvious that younger workers are claimed to be more suitable to the new changes at work. Nevertheless, I assert that it is crucial for companies to have older staff to put the young employees into the right path.
In
today&
#039; s world of
work
, it is a
widely
held perception that older
employees
lack the capability of adopting to the new
work
patterns and
thus
companies
ought to employ younger
workers
. I,
however
, hold a
different
opinion that
elderlies
still
have a significant role to play in the contemporary workplaces. In this essay, I will
endeavour
to justify my point and draw a conclusion thereof.
First
and foremost, it is
scientifically
proven that flexing to
changes
is a matter of personality type
rather
than age. In fact,
old
employees
can be adroit to be responsive to the new working process
as well
as younger
workers
. My 57-year-
old
uncle who works in a local bank can be a
good
example for this case. Despite his
old
age, he can compete with his young
collaegues
one-
handedly
in a
company
where dramatic alterations
frequently
occur.
Secondly
, mature workforce in the workplace could be an invaluable tool. Senior
employees&
#039; long-year experiences and managerial
skills
will be
considerably
benigicial
to teach young
workers
how to cope with
different
situations at
work
.
For instance
, the vast majority
big
companies
are
now
striving to
keep
their
old
staff in the team in order to polish up the immature members of the job market.
Yet
, there are
some
induviduals
who claim that
youngesters
are more preferable in employment as they are with the most
enthusiasism
and energy. Nonetheless, these could not
possibly
be
directod
into
a
best
use
without experienced
workers&
#039; practical tutorials.
In conclusion
, it is obvious that younger
workers
are claimed
to be more suitable to the new
changes
at
work
.
Nevertheless
, I assert that it is crucial for
companies
to have older staff to put the young
employees
into the right path.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
13Mistakes