It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and for this reason, younger workers are to be preferred. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and for this reason, younger workers are to be preferred. v. 1
These days, the ideas in modern job environments have been changed, thus it is believed that workers over 50 will not respond quickly to this and it is better to employ younger people as replacements. In my opinion, I partially agree with this view.
To begin with, there are several reasons for employers to use older workers at work place. Firstly, it is certainly true that older employees have more work experiences than younger people that are indispensable in any environment. Obviously, in addition to necessary knowledge of a job at workplace, experience is also a thing which employers need and this factor can be satisfied completely by older employees. Secondly, loyalty factor is also connected with older workers. Undoubtedly, workers over 50 often tend to find stable jobs, whereas young people don’t have trend of working in a kind of job for a long period of time.
However, young employees also have some remarkable qualifications which can convince employers to hire them. Responding rapidly to the changes in modern work places is the first important element which can be clearly observed in young workers. For example, as the fast development of the high-tech industry, youngsters will acquire new technology easier and quicker than older people and this brings many benefits to companies. Furthermore, young people have capacities to deal with pressures at work environments better than older ones. There are many pieces of evidence showed that the majority of older workers quit their jobs because they cannot bear an enormous amount of pressures at work.
In conclusion, I think that a mix of best qualities of old and young is preferential to ensure the most productive environment evolves.
These days, the
ideas
in modern
job
environments
have been
changed
,
thus
it
is believed
that
workers
over 50 will not respond
quickly
to this and it is better to employ younger
people
as replacements. In my opinion, I
partially
agree
with this view.
To
begin
with, there are several reasons for employers to
use
older
workers
at
work
place.
Firstly
, it is
certainly
true that
older
employees have more
work
experiences than younger
people
that are indispensable in any
environment
.
Obviously
,
in addition
to necessary knowledge of a
job
at workplace, experience is
also
a thing which employers need and this factor can
be satisfied
completely by
older
employees.
Secondly
, loyalty factor is
also
connected with
older
workers
.
Undoubtedly
,
workers
over 50
often
tend to find stable
jobs
, whereas
young
people
don’t have trend of working in a kind of
job
for a long period of time.
However
,
young
employees
also
have
some
remarkable qualifications which can convince employers to hire them. Responding
rapidly
to the
changes
in modern
work
places is the
first
important
element which can be
clearly
observed in
young
workers
.
For example
, as the
fast
development of the high-tech industry, youngsters will acquire new technology easier and quicker than
older
people
and this brings
many
benefits to
companies
.
Furthermore
,
young
people
have capacities to deal with pressures at
work
environments
better than
older
ones. There are
many
pieces of evidence
showed
that the majority of
older
workers
quit their
jobs
because
they cannot bear an enormous amount of pressures at work.
In conclusion
, I
think
that a mix
of best
qualities of
old
and
young
is preferential to ensure the most productive
environment
evolves.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
36Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes