There is a controversial issue about the importance of teaching academic subjects. Some teachers say that they are significant to study as much as maths and physics, while painters believe that they are waste of time and effort. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of great importance of art in producing income.
Let us start with the reasons why some teachers in art state that learning academic courses is beneficial for the economy. The first reason is that art normally contributes to the development of tourism. Most tourists readily spend much money in countries, where they can enjoy local culture, so students should learn art subjects to keep their country appealing to visitors. Another reason is that physical education keeps the majority of workforce healthy. Subjects, which train people to stay physically active, often spare a great deal of health expenditure for the country, because people both address to hospital rarely and become more productive at work. Furthermore, the work of art is frequently in high demand in the market. Many private collectors are willing to pay any cost for the masterpieces of unfamiliar artists, since over time they can sell them at much higher prices, when they become prominent.
However, some painters claim that completing many academic disciplines bring little profit to artists and governments. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, unemployment rate among people with academic degrees is on the rise. More artists cannot find employment in art-related fields after graduation, because many employers are oriented on hiring people majored in engineering as well as business. Secondly, many art amenities are financially inefficient. Today, people usually show little interest in art, because they work hard and find rest in gadgets. As a result, many theaters, museums and galleries not only generate little income to the government, but also they often need extra funding. Moreover, many artists usually live in poverty. Many artists chronically experienced a lack of money, as they can seldom sell their work, but they need to support their family. Therefore, they often re-study for non-academic degree, such as engineering and computer science to improve their career opportunity.
In conclusion, even though some painters argue that studying academic subjects creates little benefit to both the country and individuals, I think that people should also graduate in them, because them indirectly bring considerable value to all.
There is a controversial issue about the importance of teaching
academic
subjects
.
Some
teachers say that they are significant to study as much as
maths
and physics, while painters believe that they are waste of time and effort. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and
agree
with the
idea
of great importance of
art
in producing income.
Let
us
start
with the reasons why
some
teachers in
art
state that learning
academic
courses is beneficial for the economy. The
first
reason is that
art
normally
contributes to the development of tourism. Most tourists
readily
spend much money in
countries
, where they can enjoy local culture,
so
students should learn
art
subjects
to
keep
their
country
appealing to visitors. Another reason is that physical education
keeps
the majority of workforce healthy.
Subjects
, which train
people
to stay
physically
active,
often
spare a great deal of health expenditure for the
country
,
because
people
both address to hospital rarely and become more productive at
work
.
Furthermore
, the
work
of
art
is
frequently
in high demand in the market.
Many
private collectors are willing to pay any cost for the masterpieces of unfamiliar
artists
, since over time they can sell them at much higher prices, when they become prominent.
However
,
some
painters claim that completing
many
academic
disciplines bring
little
profit to
artists
and
governments
. They justify their opinion with the following arguments.
Firstly
, unemployment rate among
people
with
academic
degrees is on the rise. More
artists
cannot find employment in art-related fields after graduation,
because
many
employers
are oriented
on hiring
people
majored in engineering
as well
as business.
Secondly
,
many
art
amenities are
financially
inefficient.
Today
,
people
usually
show
little
interest in
art
,
because
they
work
hard
and find rest in gadgets.
As a result
,
many
theaters, museums and galleries not
only
generate
little
income to the
government
,
but
also
they
often
need extra funding.
Moreover
,
many
artists
usually
live
in poverty.
Many
artists
chronically
experienced a lack of money, as they can seldom sell their
work
,
but
they need to support their family.
Therefore
, they
often
re-study for non-academic degree, such as engineering and computer science to
improve
their career opportunity.
In conclusion
,
even though
some
painters argue that studying
academic
subjects
creates
little
benefit to both the
country
and individuals, I
think
that
people
should
also
graduate in them,
because
them
indirectly
bring considerable value to all.