Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1

Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. v. 1
Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. But it is important for the all organizations and In IT companies. Because the success of any organization depends on the quality of its staff. So, most of the employers conduct a interviews for hiring a new staff. I disagree with the given statement which says that interview is not a reliable method and other methods are better. A number of arguments surround my opinion. To begin with, there are many reasons why interview is an important method for the recruiter. First and foremost, interview is the only method in which employers can get an idea about the personality and social skill of the potential candidates. In interview, there is face to face interaction and candidate have to answer the impromptu questions, which leaves vey little scope for hiding personality traits. Also employees can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to think outside the box and so on by asking the some study type questions. On the other hand, there are many other selection methods with varied advantages. One of the other common method is prefferd when the focus is on jugging theoretical knowledge of the person. For example, in some IT companies theoretical knowledge is very important because employees have to send a email for their clients. Last but not least, there can be combination of the all the three methods like written tests, followed by group discussion and finally interview. To conclude, I cannot agree that interview is not reliable method and other methods are better. It depends upon the job and company requirement, in some situations conducting interviews is more opt and in some situations the other methods may be more advantageous.
Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
for the all organizations and In IT
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
.
“Because” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Because
the success of any organization depends on the quality of its staff.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, most of the employers conduct a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
for hiring a new staff. I disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
statement which says that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are better. A number of arguments surround my opinion.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
reasons why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for the recruiter.
First
and foremost,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
in which employers can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about the personality and social
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skill
of the potential candidates. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
, there is face to face interaction and candidate
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
answer the impromptu questions, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leaves
Possible spelling mistake found.
vey
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
scope for hiding personality traits.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Also
employees can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
outside the box and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on by asking the
Did you mean "same"?
some
study type questions.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
selection
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
with varied advantages. One of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
common
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is
Possible spelling mistake found.
prefferd
when the focus is on jugging theoretical knowledge of the person.
For example
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
IT
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
theoretical knowledge is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
employees
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
send
Use "an" instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
a
email for their clients. Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least, there can be combination of the all the three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
like written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
, followed by group discussion and
finally
interview.

To conclude
, I cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are better. It depends upon the job and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
requirement, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations conducting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
is more opt and in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
may be more advantageous.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes
Learn a new language and get a new soul.
Czech Proverb

IELTS essay Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
289 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts