Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interview are the best way to choose among employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1

Interview are the best way to choose among employees. v. 1
It is a common practice all over the world for employers to interview potential candidates. While I don’t think that this is the best way to assess the job worthiness of a particular candidate, I cannot suggest any better alternatives. In my opinion, combining the interview with mock practical tests and written examinations is the best way of finding suitable candidates. Interviews certainly are useful in many ways. The fact that they are used all over the world is a clear sign that a lot of employers find them useful. During an interview, the employer can assess the personality of a candidate to a great extent. Also there are various techniques that the interviewers can use to find out how a particular person will behave in various situations. Interviews are particularly helpful for selecting employees whose jobs require them to interact a lot with potential clients and customers. For example, people working in sales, marketing, PR or HR need good people skills that can be measured during an interview. Perhaps the biggest downside of interviews is that the candidates can come prepared and turn the interview to their advantage. It is possible to give learned answers to questions asked during an interview. In addition, it is foolish to believe that all candidates will demonstrate their true nature or work ethics during an interview. Another disadvantage of interviews is that by interviewing someone, an employer can only assess their personality and general knowledge. An interview, for example, is not a good way of measuring a person’s technical skills. By simply interviewing someone who has a degree in engineering, an employer cannot find out whether they have the skills required to deliver a good performance in the workplace. In such situations, putting the candidate through the tasks they would have to typically do before offering them a job is a better solution. To conclude, while it is true that an interview is not the best method of choosing a candidate, there aren’t many better alternatives. In my opinion, employers should combine the interview with written tests and mock practical tests to find the most suitable employees.
It is a common practice all over the world for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
. While I don’t
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that this is the best way to assess the job worthiness of a particular
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
, I cannot suggest any better alternatives. In my opinion, combining the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
with mock practical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
and written examinations is the best way of finding suitable candidates.

Interviews
certainly
are useful in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
ways. The fact that they are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
all over the world is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sign
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
find
them useful. During an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
can assess the personality of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
to a great extent.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Also
there are various techniques that the interviewers can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
find
out how a particular person will behave in various situations.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Interviews
are
particularly
helpful for selecting employees whose jobs require them to interact a lot with potential clients and customers.
For example
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
working in sales, marketing, PR or HR need
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
that can
be measured
during an interview.

Perhaps the biggest downside of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
is that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
prepared and turn the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
to their advantage. It is possible to give learned answers to questions asked during an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
.
In addition
, it is foolish to believe that all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
will demonstrate their true nature or work ethics during an interview.

Another disadvantage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
is that by interviewing someone, an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
assess their personality and general knowledge. An
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
,
for example
, is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
way of measuring a person’s technical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
. By
simply
interviewing someone who has a degree in engineering, an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
cannot
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
find
out whether they have the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
required to deliver a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
performance in the workplace. In such situations, putting the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
through the tasks they would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
typically
do
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
offering them a job is a better solution.

To conclude
, while it is true that an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not the best method of choosing a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
, there aren’t
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
better alternatives. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
should combine the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
with written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
and mock practical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
find
the most suitable employees.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
28Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay Interview are the best way to choose among employees. v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
354 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts