In recent decades, with increasing urban populations, traffic congestion and accommodation problems are two main sources that decrease the quality of life for those who living in large cities. To date, the vast majority of suggestions concerning commuting time reduction have been focused on funding from the authorities to the high speed travelling rather than public transportation. However, I disagree with this development under the urban planning points of view.
On the one hand, the solution to make faster transportation is only a modest improvement. To begin with, mass private motorisation contributed to widespread traffic congestion and increased pollution in urban areas. Planners observed the bottleneck and began major road and highway expansions for faster travelling, thus increasing the urban footprint. In time, this allowed for the introduction of employment decentralisation policies under the logic that this would reduce both traffic flows through overloaded city centres and the distance between employers and their workforces. However, accommodation problems were leading to the increase in car use for a suburban relocation in which the average distance between the employee residences and place of work increased resulting longer travelling time.
On the other hand, it should be noted that commuting behaviour is affected by the location of both workplace and residence. The span between the buildings and the city centres can be considered as a proxy for accessibility, together with the density of population and jobs nearby. Whilst workplace locations are determined by the policies as urban development, the choice of residential location is affected by different political and economic factors. Traffic congestion and pollution have been reduced significantly thanks to the reduction in the commuting distance and the observed increases in walking, bicycling and public transport usage.
Thus, spending public money on the fast transport renovation is not always the only solution. Policy initiatives that seek to reduce commuting or private car usage needs to be focussed on multiple areas in terms of relocating workplaces and homes, together with a suite of policies affecting the costs or travel times of different transport modes.
In recent decades, with increasing
urban
populations,
traffic
congestion and accommodation problems are two main sources that decrease the quality of life for those who living in large cities. To date, the vast majority of suggestions concerning commuting time reduction have
been focused
on funding from the authorities to the high speed travelling
rather
than public transportation.
However
, I disagree with this development under the
urban
planning points of view.
On the one hand, the solution to
make
faster transportation is
only
a modest improvement. To
begin
with, mass private
motorisation
contributed to widespread
traffic
congestion and increased pollution in
urban
areas. Planners observed the bottleneck and began major road and highway expansions for faster travelling,
thus
increasing the
urban
footprint. In time, this
allowed
for the introduction of employment
decentralisation
policies
under the logic that this would
reduce
both
traffic
flows through overloaded city
centres
and the distance between employers and their
workforces
.
However
, accommodation problems were leading to the increase in car
use
for a suburban relocation in which the average distance between the employee residences and place of work increased resulting longer travelling time.
On the other hand
, it should
be noted
that commuting
behaviour
is
affected
by the location of both workplace and residence. The span between the buildings and the city
centres
can
be considered
as a proxy for accessibility, together with the density of population and jobs nearby. Whilst workplace locations
are determined
by the
policies
as
urban
development, the choice of residential location is
affected
by
different
political and economic factors.
Traffic
congestion and pollution have been
reduced
significantly
thanks to the reduction in the commuting distance and the observed increases in walking, bicycling and public transport usage.
Thus
, spending public money on the
fast
transport renovation is not always the
only
solution.
Policy
initiatives that seek to
reduce
commuting or private car usage needs to
be focussed
on multiple areas in terms of relocating workplaces and homes, together with a suite of
policies
affecting the costs or travel times of
different
transport modes.