Nowadays, the school system is overly focused on grading. Some people argued that the colleges need to receive only students who had excellent transcript in high school, while others think they should give the opportunity for everyone. I do share the same view with the second group.
On the one hand, the transcript-based recruitment will introduce the problems of grade inflation and incorrect assessment. For example, when the grades of lower-calibre students get inflated, it makes them appear similar to higher-calibre students. The problem is exacerbated by the tendency for different academic departments to exhibit different rates of grade inflation and the grades are no longer a good method of ranking performance to select qualified persons.
On the other hand, standardized tests are the only thing that allows college admission professionals to control for wildly different average GPAs at different high schools. For example, if a student had a tough time in high school and ended up with a less-than-stellar transcript, a high test score could help to bolster that student’s application. But it is important to recognize that the reverse can happen, too. Students who perform well in the classroom might struggle with standardized testing. A student’s ability to learn and to process information over time is a better indicator of how they’ll fare in college, rather than something more fleeting, such as their standardized test-taking skills.
Overall, the grading would increase the pressure on teachers to inflate their grades resulting to the unfair enrolment, meanwhile the standardized tests would be able to show an applicant’s aptitude for success in college. Although in some occasions, standardized tests only seem to underscore individual weaknesses of learners and promote an unhealthy culture of one-upping each other, it is still an effective way to assess the knowledge capability of people.
Nowadays, the
school
system is
overly
focused on grading.
Some
people
argued that the colleges need to receive
only
students
who had excellent transcript in
high
school
, while others
think
they should give the opportunity for everyone. I do share the same view with the second group.
On the one hand, the transcript-based recruitment will introduce the problems of
grade
inflation and incorrect assessment.
For example
, when the
grades
of
lower-calibre
students
get
inflated, it
makes
them appear similar to
higher-calibre
students
. The problem
is exacerbated
by the tendency for
different
academic departments to exhibit
different
rates of
grade
inflation and the
grades
are no longer a
good
method of ranking performance to select qualified persons.
On the other hand
,
standardized
tests
are the
only
thing that
allows
college admission professionals to control for
wildly
different
average
GPAs at
different
high
schools
.
For example
, if a
student
had a tough time in
high
school
and ended up with a
less-than-stellar
transcript, a
high
test
score could
help
to bolster that
student’s
application.
But
it is
important
to recognize that the reverse can happen, too.
Students
who perform well in the classroom might struggle with
standardized
testing. A
student’s
ability to learn and to process information over time is a better indicator of how they’ll fare in college,
rather
than something more fleeting, such as their
standardized
test
-taking
skills
.
Overall
, the grading would increase the pressure on teachers to inflate their
grades
resulting to the unfair
enrolment
, meanwhile the
standardized
tests
would be able to
show
an applicant’s aptitude for success in college. Although in
some
occasions,
standardized
tests
only
seem to underscore individual weaknesses of learners and promote an unhealthy culture of one-upping each other, it is
still
an effective way to assess the knowledge capability of
people
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes