It is accepted that recent medical advancement and other medicinal products are normally tested on animals before they are used in human bodies. Although some people believe that animal experimentation should be able to prohibit because it is ethically undesirable, others criticize that it gains dramatic profits to humans.
On the one hand, the advocates of animal experimentation say that testing on animals is possible for medical research and other products experimenting. Animal trials enable researchers to test an appropriate dose of medication that people can obtain and ensure about human’s safety and survival. A common example for this case is that many scientists initially analyse medicinal products and additional substances that are essential to humans on animals, protecting therapeutic overdosing which creates harmful side effects to humans. That is why this determines the drug security before testing on humans.
On the other hand, some opponents may argue that analysing animals is restricted. Firstly, animal examination is cruelly tortured due to the fact that not only this causes a significant pain on animals but also reduces the number of animals in the world. Moreover, some experiments on animals potentially deliver improper results in order that investigators are not able to trust the results that originate from animals because of the difference between animals and humans in physical and mental properties. Therefore, animal observation is not possible for providing precise outcomes.
For all the above reasons, there are convincing arguments both for and against animal investigation. Although it possibly increases people's benefits, I strongly believe that experimenting on animals should be discontinued to prevent animal’s immorality.
It is
accepted
that recent medical advancement and
other
medicinal products are
normally
tested
on
animals
before
they are
used
in
human
bodies. Although
some
people
believe that
animal
experimentation should be able to prohibit
because
it is
ethically
undesirable, others criticize that it gains dramatic profits to humans.
On the one hand, the advocates of
animal
experimentation say that testing on
animals
is possible for medical research and
other
products experimenting.
Animal
trials enable researchers to
test
an appropriate dose of medication that
people
can obtain and ensure about
human’s
safety and survival. A common example for this case is that
many
scientists
initially
analyse
medicinal products and additional substances that are essential to
humans
on
animals
, protecting therapeutic overdosing which creates harmful side effects to
humans
.
That is
why this determines the drug security
before
testing on humans.
On the
other
hand,
some
opponents may argue that
analysing
animals
is restricted
.
Firstly
,
animal
examination is
cruelly
tortured due to the fact that not
only
this causes a significant pain on
animals
but
also
reduces
the number of
animals
in the world.
Moreover
,
some
experiments on
animals
potentially
deliver improper results in order that investigators are not able to trust the results that originate from
animals
because
of the difference between
animals
and
humans
in physical and mental properties.
Therefore
,
animal
observation is not possible for providing precise outcomes.
For all the above reasons, there are convincing arguments both for and against
animal
investigation. Although it
possibly
increases
people
's benefits, I
strongly
believe that experimenting on
animals
should
be discontinued
to
prevent
animal’s
immorality.