In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products, for instance, clothing and medicines. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products, for instance, clothing and medicines. v. 1
Nowadays, the technology creates a different kind of products, including a variation of the ones that are produced by the animals. I think that is important to replace the products that promoted animal cruelty with the new developments. However, there are others that it could be necessary to obtain directly from animals for health reasons.
Historically, the humanity had been using plenty of animal products that help the development of the society and the technology including agriculture, transportation and communication. Despite, there are some products or activities that provoked animal cruelty, for instance, make up testing in monkeys, rabbits and pigs or use horses like a work force in urban areas. This kind of acts should not be tolerated based on the protection of the environment and the nature.
On the other hand, a plenty variety of animal products like eggs, wool or milk, that are produced without animal suffering, had been reproduced in laboratories, but these synthetic products do not have the same qualities, and could develop health issues such as gastric pathologies, skin problems, cancer and mutagenic illness. This example, supports the view that in specific situatios the technology advance had not reached the mother nature.
In conclusion, I agree to replace the products that affect the animal integrity, but for the substitute products that could affect the peoples health it is preferred to maintain the natural resource. If the society could solve the enigma of the synthetic products provoked illness, it would be a necessary act to let the animals be free.
Nowadays, the technology creates a
different
kind of
products
, including a variation of the ones that
are produced
by the
animals
. I
think
that is
important
to replace the
products
that promoted
animal
cruelty with the new developments.
However
, there are others that it could be necessary to obtain
directly
from
animals
for health reasons.
Historically
, the humanity had been using
plenty
of
animal
products
that
help
the development of the society and the technology including agriculture, transportation and communication. Despite, there are
some
products
or activities that provoked
animal
cruelty,
for instance
,
make
up testing in monkeys, rabbits and pigs or
use
horses like a work force in urban areas. This kind of acts should not
be tolerated
based on the protection of the environment and the nature.
On the other hand
, a
plenty
variety of
animal
products
like eggs, wool or milk, that
are produced
without
animal
suffering, had
been reproduced
in laboratories,
but
these synthetic
products
do not have the same qualities, and could develop health issues such as gastric pathologies, skin problems, cancer and mutagenic illness. This example, supports the view that in specific
situatios
the technology advance had not reached the mother nature.
In conclusion
, I
agree
to replace the
products
that affect the
animal
integrity,
but
for the substitute
products
that could affect the
peoples
health it
is preferred
to maintain the natural resource. If the society could solve the enigma of the synthetic
products
provoked illness, it would be a necessary act to
let
the
animals
be free.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
18Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes