Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. This could be good news for individuals but it may have negative consequences for our society. What are the benefits and risks of people living to 150? v.3

To live a longer life has been a dream for countless years. With the development of science and technology, it might be possible for people to live for one hundred and fifty years in the near future. However, in my opinion, it may not be beneficial for people to do so. Undoubtedly, there are some major advantages for living a longer life. Firstly, people could enjoy longer lives and do more of the things they want, such as trying different lifestyles. They could spend more time with their family and even watch their children grow to old age. In addition, people could contribute more if they lived longer lives, especially scientists and other valuable members of society. For example, if Edison had lived longer, he might have invented more things for us or Mozart might have produced more wonderful music. Nevertheless, there could be many disadvantages if people lived for one hundred and fifty years. Firstly, people might be unhealthy in their later years because their body organs are unable to deal with extreme age. Additionally, more people may suffer from painful diseases such as arthritis. Another factor is that an increasing older population would cause many problems for society. For example, it would place a lot of pressure on the social welfare system, a situation already developing in countries. In conclusion, I believe that the disadvantages for people living for one hundred and fifty years far outweigh the advantages. Therefore, this development would be a largely negative one for our society.

To You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlengthyprotractedgreatdeephightall
longer
 life has been a dream for countless years. With the development of science and technology, it You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be possible for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 for one hundred and fifty years in the near future. However
, in my opinion, it may not be beneficial for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to do This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
.

Undoubtedly
, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 major advantages for living a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlengthyprotractedgreatdeephightall
longer
 life. Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 could enjoy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlengthyprotractedgreatdeephightall
longer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
 and do more of the things they want, such as trying This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 lifestyles. They could spend more time with their family and even This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
watch
 their children grow to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
 age. In addition
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 could contribute more if they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlengthyprotractedgreatdeephightall
longer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
, especially
 scientists and other valuable members of society. For example
, if Edison had This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlengthyprotractedgreatdeephightall
longer
, he You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 have invented more things for us or Mozart You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 have produced more wonderful music.

Nevertheless
, there could be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 disadvantages if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
 for one hundred and fifty years. Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpotencyefficacyvalor
might
 be unhealthy in their later years This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 their body organs are unable to deal with extreme age. Additionally
, more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 may suffer from painful diseases such as arthritis. Another factor is that an increasing older population would cause This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 problems for society. For example
, it would place This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 pressure on the social welfare system, a situation already developing in countries.

In conclusion
, I believe that the disadvantages for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 living for one hundred and fifty years far outweigh the advantages. Therefore
, this development would be a largely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 one for our society. 