In recent decades, many researchers have studied the importance of investments in preventive measures to cope with diseases. Indeed, to my mind, there is convincing evidence that prevention is more logical than a cure. In this essay, I will examine how research in high health expenditures and the quality of life.
To begin with, medical treatment at hospitals requires high costs for taxpayers. This is because medical equipment and medicines are expensive, which will increase the burden on hospitals as well as taxpayers. For example, a recent Cambridge study showed that 55% of illnesses could be cured by preventive measurements instead of visiting the emergency room. Therefore, it is obviously the case that patients should be accustomed to apply preventive treatments rather than utilizing costly medical care so as to decrease medical expenditures for public health.
Secondly, quality of life can be attributed to the gist of conditions of patients directly. This is because any medical issue will decline in the pleasure of existence due to pain and allocating a great deal of time for hospital visiting. For instance, a study by Oxford found that 40% of patients believed that the recovery process makes their existence becoming ruined owing to the experiencing undesired situations and they thought that preclusive actions can help them to abate the chances of having serious diseases in the future. Thus, it is certainly the case that satisfaction of existence can be enhanced by promoting prophylactic policies to keep the community healthy.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the notion that preclusive measures are beneficial for the salvation of the public in terms of reductions in health care costs and soar in the quality of life of the public. In the future, we will apparently see that a great number of individuals will keep their wellbeing high in order to get rid of medical problems in the future.
In recent decades,
many
researchers have studied the importance of investments in preventive measures to cope with diseases.
Indeed
, to my mind, there is convincing evidence that prevention is more logical than a cure. In this essay, I will examine how research in high health expenditures and the quality of life.
To
begin
with,
medical
treatment at hospitals requires high costs for taxpayers. This is
because
medical
equipment and medicines are expensive, which will increase the burden on hospitals
as well
as taxpayers.
For example
, a recent Cambridge study
showed
that 55% of illnesses could
be cured
by preventive measurements
instead
of visiting the emergency room.
Therefore
, it is
obviously
the case that patients should be
accustomed to apply
preventive treatments
rather
than utilizing costly
medical
care
so as to
decrease
medical
expenditures for public health.
Secondly
, quality of life can
be attributed
to the gist of conditions of patients
directly
. This is
because
any
medical
issue will decline in the pleasure of existence due to pain and allocating a great deal of time for hospital visiting.
For instance
, a study by Oxford found that 40% of patients believed that the recovery process
makes
their existence becoming ruined owing to the experiencing undesired
situations and
they
thought
that
preclusive
actions can
help
them to abate the chances of having serious diseases in the future.
Thus
, it is
certainly
the case that satisfaction of existence can
be enhanced
by promoting prophylactic policies to
keep
the community healthy.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
agree
with the notion that
preclusive
measures are beneficial for the salvation of the public in terms of reductions in health care costs and soar in the quality of life of the public. In the future, we will
apparently
see
that a great number of individuals will
keep
their
wellbeing
high in order to
get
rid of
medical
problems in the future.