In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? v.4
In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? v. 4
There is no scope for any doubt that "Smoking is injurious to health ". Taking this fact into consideration, many countries have taken actions of strictly prohibiting smoking in public places. I strongly feel that this is a good move to reduce smoking and keeping the environment safe, even though many smokers are strongly against this move.
First of all, smoking not only affects the health condition of the smokers but also of the nonsmokers by a process called passive smoking. In fact, it is a scientifically proven fact that passive smokers get more health hazards compared to the smokers. Various diseases like asthma, lung cancer, pneumonia, heart and valve ailments are found common among such individuals. This is why, to improve the public health and to prevent dangerous diseases, banning smoking in public places and in office buildings is an effective move.
Secondly, smoking in public places like schools, parks, shopping complexes, beaches, offices etc. tend to develop a strong desire among young generation to inculcate this habit. To nurture a healthy young generation, we should support the idea that public smoking should be banned.
Finally, by discouraging smoking in outdoor areas, the smokers can be gradually forced to quit their habit or can reduce the number of cigarettes being smoked. Considering this I feel that banning public smoking is a good rule and all countries should adopt this policy.
In conclusion, I strongly recommend that all countries should put forward this rule for the health and well-being of their public. Even the smoking zones that are already placed in some of the public places should also be banned completely.
There is no scope for any doubt that
"
Smoking is injurious to
health
"
. Taking this fact into consideration,
many
countries have taken actions of
strictly
prohibiting
smoking
in
public
places
. I
strongly
feel that this is a
good
move
to
reduce
smoking
and keeping the environment safe,
even though
many
smokers are
strongly
against this
move
.
First of all
,
smoking
not
only
affects the
health
condition of the smokers
but
also
of the nonsmokers by a process called passive
smoking
. In fact, it is a
scientifically
proven fact that passive smokers
get
more
health
hazards compared to the smokers. Various diseases like asthma, lung cancer, pneumonia, heart and valve ailments
are found
common among such individuals. This is why, to
improve
the
public
health
and to
prevent
dangerous
diseases, banning
smoking
in
public
places
and in office buildings is an effective
move
.
Secondly
,
smoking
in
public
places
like schools, parks, shopping complexes, beaches, offices etc. tend to develop a strong desire among young generation to inculcate this habit. To nurture a healthy young generation, we should support the
idea
that
public
smoking
should
be banned
.
Finally
, by discouraging
smoking
in outdoor areas, the smokers can be
gradually
forced to quit their habit or can
reduce
the number of cigarettes
being smoked
. Considering this I feel that banning
public
smoking
is a
good
rule
and all countries should adopt this policy.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
recommend that all countries should put forward this
rule
for the
health
and well-being of their
public
. Even the
smoking
zones that are already placed in
some of the
public
places
should
also
be banned
completely.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
28Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes