The number of divorced couples is far high in countries which practice a tradition to arrange marriages, while this is significantly less in democratic countries; nonetheless, those countries appear to continue the tradition despite the substantial number of divorce. In my opinion, marriages should not be predetermined in terms of demography and economy.
Arranged marriages have a direct contribution to the reduced number of birthrate since couples who are forced to get married usually get divorced within a year without having a chance to conceive a child. This practice is conducted and believed to be successful among wealthy families since it is undesirable to share their fortune with plebs; however, it is the unsuccessful approach for average since they constitute of the main proportion of overall population. Thus, the more predetermined marriages, especially among the middle-class population, the less number of birthrate, which, in turn, decreases the chance of a country to prosper as the country will experience employee scarcity in the foreseeable future.
The decreased number of population inevitably affects economy of a country since it shrinks the number of taxpayers and laborers, which triggers a myriad of social problems. The government with negative budget balance, for instance, can not afford to construct infrastructures, which is vital to prosper and to develop for a country. Moreover, when those couples who divorced due to arranged marriages, as a result lack of any children, are predicted to be an additional burden to the governmental budget since the government will have taken care of them when they are retired.
The tradition of arranging marriage has a direct effect on the prosperity of a country. Thus, it is critical that a marriage is not predetermined; otherwise, it has a dramatic adverse effect on development of a country.
The
number
of divorced couples is far high in
countries
which practice a tradition to arrange
marriages
, while this is
significantly
less in democratic
countries
; nonetheless, those
countries
appear to continue the tradition despite the substantial
number
of divorce. In my opinion,
marriages
should not
be predetermined
in terms of demography and economy.
Arranged
marriages
have a direct contribution to the
reduced
number
of birthrate since couples who
are forced
to
get
married
usually
get
divorced within a year without having a chance to conceive a child. This practice
is conducted
and believed to be successful among wealthy families since it is undesirable to share their fortune with plebs;
however
, it is the unsuccessful approach for average since they constitute of the main proportion of
overall
population.
Thus
, the more predetermined
marriages
,
especially
among the middle-
class
population, the less
number
of birthrate, which, in turn, decreases the chance of a
country
to prosper as the
country
will experience employee scarcity in the foreseeable future.
The decreased
number
of population
inevitably
affects economy of a
country
since it shrinks the
number
of taxpayers and laborers, which triggers a myriad of social problems. The
government
with
negative
budget balance,
for instance
, can not afford to construct infrastructures, which is vital to prosper and to develop for a
country
.
Moreover
, when those couples who divorced due to arranged
marriages
,
as a result
lack of any children,
are predicted
to be an additional burden to the governmental budget since the
government
will have taken care of them when they
are retired
.
The tradition of arranging
marriage
has a direct effect on the prosperity of a
country
.
Thus
, it is critical that a
marriage
is not predetermined;
otherwise
, it has a dramatic adverse effect on development of a
country
.