In many countries, it is allowed for people to keep guns in order to protect their houses from criminals. Some people believe that it has a huge gain for the owners than its drawback. On the other hand, some folks believe that it is inappropriate if every house owner has guns on their desk as it would increase the death rate from gunfire. It is not an easy topic to talk about, but this essay will discuss it.
At first, a number of realms have certain regulation about firearm allowance for the public is caused by security point of view. They claimed that every person has their own right and duty to protect their own belongings, and any trespasser considered as a criminal. Such situations are commonly found in liberalism country, where privacy is the highest priority. What they believe are gradual with their ideology, and law about pistol possession cannot be helped.
However, some thought grew in society. Believe that firearm owning are wrong, because it may harm other people. It is misused by their owner, instead to protect them. Gun sometimes used to hurt or even kill other people. From this, tonnes of people start to argue if it worth enough to let civilian to have their own gun for protection?
The gunshot wounds and death rate from the gunshots is significantly higher in those countries where citizens are allowed to keep guns freely. The possessions of guns often drive people to commit crimes that were otherwise impossible. These events clearly state that there are other better ways of ensuring citizens’ safety rather than allowing having guns and shooting any trespasser.
At last, we could see that firearm allowance is a total doom. At first, it is for protection, but it has become a threat to our society instead of becoming an assured security. I personally believe that people could protect their own lives and houses without guns, and police are more than enough to handle some big crimes that require guns to handle.
In
many
countries, it is
allowed
for
people
to
keep
guns
in order to
protect
their
houses
from criminals.
Some
people
believe
that it has a huge gain for the owners than its drawback. On the
other
hand,
some
folks
believe
that it is inappropriate if every
house
owner has
guns
on their desk as it would increase the death rate from gunfire. It is not an easy topic to talk about,
but
this essay will discuss it.
At
first
, a number of realms have certain regulation about firearm allowance for the public
is caused
by security point of view. They claimed that every person has their
own
right and duty to
protect
their
own
belongings, and any trespasser considered as a criminal. Such situations are
commonly
found in liberalism country, where privacy is the highest priority. What they
believe
are gradual with their ideology, and law about pistol possession cannot be
helped
.
However
,
some
thought
grew in society.
Believe
that firearm owning are
wrong
,
because
it may harm
other
people
. It
is misused
by their owner,
instead
to
protect
them.
Gun
sometimes
used
to hurt or even kill
other
people
. From this, tonnes of
people
start
to argue if
it
worth
enough
to
let
civilian to have their
own
gun
for protection?
The gunshot wounds and death rate from the gunshots is
significantly
higher in those countries where citizens are
allowed
to
keep
guns
freely
. The possessions of
guns
often
drive
people
to commit crimes that were
otherwise
impossible. These
events
clearly
state that there are
other
better ways of ensuring citizens’ safety
rather
than allowing having
guns
and shooting any trespasser.
At last, we could
see
that firearm allowance is a total doom. At
first
, it is for protection,
but
it has become a threat to our society
instead
of becoming an assured security. I
personally
believe
that
people
could
protect
their
own
lives
and
houses
without
guns
, and police are more than
enough
to handle
some
big
crimes that require
guns
to handle.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
29Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes