Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. v.3

Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. v. 3
There is a dramatic increase in private transportation around the globe over the last few years. Increased wages, economic prosperity and depletion in vehicle prices made easy for people to have their own personal car. However, this has led to various detrimental issues including congestion, pollution and safety. For those reasons, I believe that limiting the number of cars in bigger cities could mitigate those problems. Completely banning cars in big cities is not a plausible solution as it is unrealistic, however, restricting the number of such private cars would be an effective solution indeed. Nowadays, traffic contributed a lot in widespread of pollution. Car smoke, traffic jams and loud horns of vehicles are few reasons that significantly affect the environment and people in many ways. People are more vulnerable to various diseases and many have serious health issues due to pollution. In order to tackle this issues, restriction on private car ownership should be imposed. Not allowing people to drive their cars in big cities is not possible while it is much reasonable to restrict the number of cars a family can own, the number of minimum passenger on each car while driving would be the two pragmatic solutions. Additionally, in order to combat with traffic congestion, new road infrastructure have been introduced by various nations that include deforestation to acquire more space to build new roads, modern bridges and pedestrian pathways. Those development works could destroy the natural habitat of various species that could lead towards the extinction of them from various countries. Nevertheless, prudent decisions should be taken to enhance the number of roads without doing any harm to the natural environment. On the other hand, personal vehicles are more convenient and safer than other means of transportation. This is not surprising that people often feel more comfortable and relaxed while driving their cars. Completely banning the use of private cars in cities would deprive people to travel freely and according to their own preference. To sum up, controlling and restricting vehicles in large cities would definitely play a pivotal role in improving people’s health and would also help in controlling factors that are the cause of deteriorating situation of the environment. But banning the private cars completely in big cities is not a pragmatic solution in my opinion.
There is a dramatic increase in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
transportation around the globe over the last few years. Increased wages, economic prosperity and depletion in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicle
prices made easy for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to have their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
.
However
, this has led to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
various
detrimental issues including congestion, pollution and safety. For those reasons, I believe that limiting the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in bigger
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
could mitigate those problems. Completely banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
is not a plausible solution as it is unrealistic,
however
, restricting the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
would be an effective solution
indeed
.

Nowadays, traffic contributed a lot in widespread of pollution.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Car
smoke, traffic jams and loud horns of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
are few reasons that
significantly
affect the environment and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
ways.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
are more vulnerable to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
various
diseases and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
have serious health issues due to pollution. In order to tackle this issues, restriction on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
ownership should
be imposed
. Not allowing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to drive their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
is not possible while it is much reasonable to restrict the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
a family can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of minimum passenger on each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
while driving would be the two pragmatic solutions.

Additionally
, in order to combat with traffic congestion, new road infrastructure have
been introduced
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
various
nations that include deforestation to acquire more space to build new roads, modern bridges and pedestrian pathways. Those development works could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
the natural habitat of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
various
species that could lead towards the extinction of them from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
various
countries.
Nevertheless
, prudent decisions should
be taken
to enhance the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of roads without doing any harm to the natural environment.

On the other hand
, personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
are more convenient and safer than other means of transportation. This is not surprising that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
feel more comfortable and relaxed while driving their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
. Completely banning the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
would deprive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to travel
freely
and according to their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
preference.

To sum up, controlling and restricting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
in large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
would definitely play a pivotal role in improving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
health and would
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
in controlling factors that are the cause of deteriorating situation of the environment.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
banning the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
completely in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
is not a pragmatic solution in my opinion.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
44Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. v. 3

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
382 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts